• nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did that person draw that specific frame all by themselves? If no then it’s still using others’ copyrighted work + own input.

  • Xanvial@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    But isn’t the reply is right?

    What’s the relation between using other people art and the user credentials? Should the AI art okay as long as the one published it already has good credentials?

          • Xanvial@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s no mention of Invincible in left side picture, how am I supposed to know that?

              • Azzu@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It is indeed possible to not know what show the meme on the left is from…

                • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  That’s 100% possible, yeah, but that’s not the point and that’s not why I accused then of trolling.

                  It goes back to reading comprehension. This user is either incapable of seeing the context supplied, or being dense on purpose. All they had to do was see they’re an animator who has a list of shows avaliable, and even if they don’t know what that one show is is, the implication of the two images being supplied together is it IS their art. That’s pretty straight forward context clues involved. This sub is “Don’t you know who I am”, which isn’t even subtext, that’s a direct message to the meaning of the material presented.

                  They however couldn’t possibly grasp this very simple idea and instead took to arguing when it was pointed out.

                • 257m@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They said in their reply that there is no mention of invincible on the left. They clearly know the show and are trolling.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t about “good credentials”, the person making the post was actually an animator for Invincible (where the image is from).

      So it’s the artist posting a meme with their own art from a series, someone accusing them of stealing the art (saying they are as bad as AI) while the artist was actually part of the team that made the series. What is there not to get?

            • TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fair enough, but it was also a reference to Archer, a joke if you will.

              On the OP. I went from top left, than down, then to the right. Saw the meme template (I didn’t know what was it from), and read the replies. I saw the imdb page and thought “Oh, this meme must be from that show and he wrote it. Burn! Hah. That’s funny.”

              And that was it. A fairly certain conclusion given the context.

        • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not at all, but this is how this sub works. It usually goes:

          1. Person A posts something

          2. Person B tells them they stole it or have no clue about the topic

          3. Someone brings up that Person A is actually the owner of the thing, or a leading expert in the field (see the right side of the the meme in this case)

          4. (optional) Person B finds out they are dumb and apologize

          • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And at no point does OP actually explain what the fuck is going on, just act smug when we don’t immediately know what they’re on about.