As part of his Labor Day message to workers in the United States, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday re-upped his call for the establishment of a 20% cut to the workweek with no loss in pay—an idea he said is “not radical” given the enormous productivity gains over recent decades that have resulted in massive profits for corporations but scraps for employees and the working class.

“It’s time for a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay,” Sanders wrote in a Guardian op-ed as he cited a 480% increase in worker productivity since the 40-hour workweek was first established in 1940.

“It’s time,” he continued, “that working families were able to take advantage of the increased productivity that new technologies provide so that they can enjoy more leisure time, family time, educational and cultural opportunities—and less stress.”

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      TL;DR: Corruption and capitalism

      Any kind of socialism (even relatively-speaking weak social democrats like Bernie) is severely underrepresented in US politics due to the influence of private money/capital in the government and in elections. The two party system/first past the post voting doesn’t help matters either.

      The people with money actively want to supress socialism by any means necessary. Look at Joe McCarthy and the Red Scare if you want an example in US history that still affects us today.

      Also Reagan with deregulation and Bill Clinton with “triangulation” (effectively becoming more economically right wing by finding the middle ground between right and left, while the right is constantly pushing right. See: the Ratchet Effect)

      Bernie is one of the extremely few principled politicians who doesn’t take corporate money, but he also lacks power as he is one person.

    • deadtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cause he’s one of the few that actually give a shit. Its why the DNC did everything in their power to scuttle his primary run. Can’t have a president that actually wants to help the common American cause then the corporate overlords might lose their stranglehold on them.

  • jasondj@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the sake of comparison…

    1940 median US male salary was $956. Women earned about 62¢ on the dollar to men.

    Adjusted for inflation, that’s about $21,800.

    Median US income (overall) in 2023 is $42,800.

    You mean to tell me productivity has gone up 4.8x, and I don’t even see 2x the increase in salary.

    Put otherwise, if my hours are worth nearly 5x to you, why aren’t they even worth 2x to me?

  • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s simply not possible, I need my employees to be working more hours, not less. Last year I could barely afford my sailing trip to Aruba. If such a law passes I’m going to have to fire some people for sure or raise rents on my tenants.

  • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would absolutely love to only work 32 hours a week instead of 40, 45 or 50.

    I would also love four weeks vacation a year, full healthcare coverage and a unicorn in my backyard please.

    • ccunix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In France I work 32 hours, have 7 weeks holiday and awesome healthcare.

      I have cows in place of a unicorn though.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean they have to raise the retirement age and had (are having?) Protests about it the whole year didn’t they

        • lady_maria@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “Have to”? That’s obviously more than up for debate, especially considering how many people protested.

          God forbid they consider increasing taxes for the rich instead.

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The unicorn comment makes me think you’re being a sarcastic ass.

      The rest of your comment is 100% doable. At least, lots of other countries are doing it.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I was just kidding about the unicorn, as living in the US it seems just about as likely to get a unicorn as getting universal healthcare or vacation.

        😅🦄

        Anyway, my son loves unicorns and I grew up watching my little pony so whatever