• porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    "Misleading: Trump did not overturn Roe v. Wade. The nonpartisan Supreme Court determined that it actually violated the Constitution. 🇺🇸 "

  • sisatici [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Listen here tankie.

    Utilising the power you gained is the peak dictator behaviour. Every dictator has done so. No wonder you want your government to do that.

    You need to do as little as possible to not be dictator. Less things you do, less of a dictator you are. IT’S POLITICS 101 YOU IGNORANT BUFFOON

  • GnastyGnuts [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Democrats are a bottomless well of excuses. “We had a majority, but we re-created the two-party gridlock between ourselves!”

    Other classics:

    “We have a majority to extend the eviction moratorium, but not enough people showed up to votes!” (for liberals who don’t understand why this is a bad excuse, “we could have done it but we just fucked off from work that day” is an excuse that gets you fired in any other profession. And it’s not like the expiration of the eviction moratorium was a surprise or something, calendars exist and the date was known)

    “We have a majority to pass Biden’s agenda, but the parliamentarian won’t let us!” (this is a bad excuse because the parliamentarian can be unilaterally fired and hired at the whim of the senate majority leader, who was a democrat. And you can’t say “well it would be wrong to set that precedent”, because the republicans already did that shit under Bush)

    smuglord : “Do you understand how your own government works?”

    The only correct answer is “like shit. It works like shit.”

    • sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      “We have a majority to extend the eviction moratorium, but not enough people showed up to votes!”

      Chat is this real

    • Runcible [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      the parliamentarian is also a made up office that has no power and no one is beholden to them. It’d be like if I went and just gave them my opinion every day.

  • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Obama must have been an evil CCP agent because watching the US erode and collapse while barely lifting a finger is the CCP’s tactic.

  • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    21 hours ago

    A serious party would hold the vote anyway, and withhold campaign funding from party members that act against it.

    Clearly they don’t hold bodily autonomy very highly, or they wouldn’t be compromising on it.

    • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      17 hours ago

      >Rich, white, slaveowning males living on stolen land breaks away from the British Empire to create a country even more favourable for Rich white males

      >Nerds glorifying you to the point of godhood and preserving your hastily scrawled constitution to the death centuries later

      Fellas, why are we doing a communism when governance was perfected by people who considered Scandinavians “”“tawny”“”??? Look at the outcome! The richest nation in the history of the planet! Only 2 political parties that overlap 90% of the time! A fundamental ideology that’s impervious to time and amendments!

      They didn’t want the poor masses holding power then, and the poor masses don’t hold power now!

      They wanted the coloureds to be an underclass of serfs and servants then, and the coloureds are still largely serfs and servants now!

      They wanted imperialism and genocide then, and they’re still doing imperialism and genocide now!

      They wanted women to be second class citizens then, and women are still second class citizens now!

      The rich wrote the laws then, and the rich still write the laws now!

      • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 hours ago

        reminded me of this

        Colonists steal native land and rename it Massachusetts. Centuries of exploitation, slavery, and war go by to establish white supremacist authority in the region. Henry David Thoreau is born. He goes to live in a shack his friend helped him build and his sister and mom helped him finance. The property is owned and controlled privately and administered by an evil slave-owning empire. His mom visits twice per week to give him pies and clean his socks. He regularly goes into town to buy food grown by exploited farm labor and probably slaves too.

        Thoreau: “Ah, untapped, unspoiled nature. Living off the land and writing fancy boy essays. I’m truly the master of my own destiny.”

  • GoodGuyWithACat [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Political parties in the US aren’t really political parties, they’re cash networks. People can vote how they want and they can’t really get kicked out.

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Non-meme answer: both Republicans and Democrats have party whips (other parties in other countries, too, but talking about the US here). A whip is a member of the party who holds office in congress and there’s one for both the House and Senate. They are appointed by leaders within the party.

      A whip’s job is to make sure other party members vote alongside the party platform. They do this in a variety of ways, such as offering to make changes to bills or threatening to withhold election funds for a person’s reelection. Their role is an enforcer. Party members who step outside of what the party wants voted on become targets of the whip’s attention.

      This is generally seen as a full-time position and as such, whips may spend less time involved with congressional committees or drafting legislation. A whip and their staff will use most of their resources on enforcing party discipline.

      It’s how you know Democrats are full of shit when they talk about “not having enough votes,” even when their party occupies the most seats in congress. They have two whips whose full-time job is making sure everyone votes consistently with what the president and other party leaders want done. If a whip is ineffective at enforcing party discipline, the party can appoint a new whip immediately since it’s not an elected position.

    • Runcible [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      this has always driven me batshit. Like they’d talk about how they couldn’t ask the arkansas democrat or whatever the fuck to vote for signature legislation because it would lose Democrats the seat, which ok but if you won’t use it for your biggest priority then what use is it?

  • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    These people do such a phenomenal job of fostering voter apathy

    “Vote for us and we’ll do all these things!”

    “Ok but what about when you had the votes but didn’t do all these things you said you would do?”

    “We didn’t actually have the votes then even though those were our party members, because they voted with conservatives many times”

    “So what will make this time different?”

    “You’re just a TRUMPANZEE FAN PUTLERBOT”

    It is never the fault of liberal politicians for failing to accomplish things, even when it is quite literally liberal politicians’ fault for not doing things.