A little disappointed with how computer-generated some of these look. Tips?

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Most of them look like they’ve been pulled like taffy. Nice otherwise. It’s usually the hands, shadows, and background alignment that give it away. Well that and the folks who generate grotesquely large breasts.

    Anyway I’ve gotten way worse stuff. But it’s definitely uncanny valley.

    • Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah… It’s exactly that taffy quality. Looks either like a caramel over a wiremesh model or as if someone painted over the pictures with way too much airbrush. Still working on improving, I guess.

  • OnlyTakesLs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Use a different model, I would browse civitai and grab a couple realistic models. Youll have try some and see what you like best.

    • Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe that’s my problem. I’m just playing around with the perchance image generator. I guess I should set up stable diffusion to run? (Right? There’s no easy way of telling perchance.com to use a specific model?)

      • Cavendish@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Don’t know anything about Perchance, but if you have the option of running Stable Diffusion locally, that will give you a ton of stylistic options.