Apparently, I’ve been under a rock as today’s thread from Cory Doctrow - @pluralistic@mamot.fr is the first I had heard of this.
Where I live such entertainers are considered independent contractors (1099) and as such it is ILLEGAL for them to unionize. Is there something different in California that qualifies them as employees (W2)?
If not, how did they get around the capitalist governments’ rules?
Arent voice actors independant contractors and have a union, why would it stop other groups?
It wouldnt. The bigger issue is strippers generally dont do it for a long time, harder to form a union when theres high turnover.
While some entertainers do it for a short time, there are plenty that do it for 20+ years.
True, very true. Admittedly, I don’t go to strip clubs. Never felt the need when internet porn exists.
But I do know that turnover is often encouraged to help keep unions from forming.