• filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Because they’re fragile. You don’t want your screen to die on the first drop.

      • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        and you don’t want it full of scratches, since cover glasses and protection cases will probably be quite complicated for these monstrosities?

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is a very cool piece of technology. The comments here naysaying about it seem odd to me. If it’s not for you that’s fine, but many millions of foldables have been bought over the past few years, and they continue to sell very well today

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      it is a very cool technical achievement, but the user experience leaves a lot to be desired with them. most people don’t think about comparing. which is the only way i can imagine samsung getting as big as they have.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Statement with no substance. What do you desire that’s not there?

        Aside from the screen being softer and easier to scratch, name a practical difference between this and another 10" Android tablet…

        If a 10" tablet meets your desires, and your desire to fold it and put it in your pocket, what’s left?

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          well that is part of the user experience. the main thing that annoys me though is that the ui tends to go one of two ways for these devices; either it’s super-custom to the point that all application developers have to do extra work to be usable on it, or there’s too little customisation, which again means apps are not properly usable without extra work. i’ve not seen a folding device that “just works” yet.

  • athairmor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is going to be like shaving razors, isn’t it? How soon before quad-fold phones?

  • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    No word on if it’s coming to the EU :(

    My pixel 6 is dying and I’d like to get something for graphene or another less monopolized distro but there’s no support for phones released this year as far as I can tell from most distros so I’m looking for one more normal phone until hopefully that ecosystem is better off.

    Even the new pixels look weak from several angles It was hard to get want them after all the reviews came in.

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’re looking for a replacement for your Pixel that is also not too monopolized, and the first thing that comes to mind is Samsung?

      • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s comments like this that make me worried about literacy rates and reading comprehension.

        I want to replace my Pixel with a cutting edge phone that is user friendly, repairable, highly private, has all the features I like, and whose company is owned by its workers and not evil.

        That phone doesn’t exist.

        So now we talk priorities. With Google looking to close down android, I want something more open than stock android. My options are very limited. Graphene only works on the pixel line and not even the newest pixels, which are very underwhelming, so that’s not a great fit. LineageOS doesn’t seem to support any new phones albeit I didn’t cross reference every phone. The nothing phone, and every other competitor, seems lackluster as well.

        So I’ve resigned to settling for any phone that’s cutting edge. If this is going to hopefully be my last mega evil corpo phone, I’ve been flirting with going with multiple screens because I doubt in 3 years there will be a non-corpo folding phone option if the normal slabs are still struggling. Samsung only “comes to mind”, and this might surprise or confound you, because we’re commenting on a thread about a Samsung phone.

        If anyone has better recommendations for a last corpo phone out now or on the horizon, I’m all ears. And if someone wants to try and convince me there’s a great phone out there that can run a non-stock OS and still be a largely enjoyable experience I’m also ready to be wow’ed. But I’ve looked around a bit and failed to find anything.

        • MurrayL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s possible to clarify your position without first insulting the person you’re replying to, fyi

        • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There’s always Fairphone and Shiftphone if you’re living in the EU. Not cutting edge, but should be more than good enough for most people. (Oh, and my Fairphone 5 is honestly built like a tank.)

        • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          So I’ve resigned to settling for any phone that’s cutting edge.

          If you drop the “cutting edge” condition instead, you could grab a Fairphone, which ticks all the other checkboxes.

          Unless you game on your phone, you won’t notice a thing between modern high end and low end phones as long as they put enough RAM in.

          Samsung is the opposite of everything you mentioned besides cutting edge.

    • Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Maybe try a phone that isn’t trash as soon as the battery dies. Something repairable.

      • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I mean I’d love to buddy. When someone releases a phone with all the modern features I want and the best processor and a repairable battery (or any other of the consumer friendly practices we all want) I’ll buy it. But don’t act like I’m choosing to not get the ideal phone when it doesn’t exist. It’s compromises everywhere.

        • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          all the modern features I want

          What are those? Because the difference between midrange and top of the line has been shrinking from year to year.

          the best processor

          What do you do with your phone that needs the best processor? Maybe you have some special use case, but the vast majority of people don’t need the best processor - often that’s a case of chasing the shiny new thing.

  • KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Whose brilliant idea was it to demo this with a wallpaper that looks like a shitty diagonal screen fold?

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Impressive from an engineering standpoint and it’s only going to get more refined. Give it 5-10 years and maybe they will be durable enough for regular use.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I guess i don’t really see the point. Is there a strong use case out there, or is this a marge’s potato? (“I just think they’re neat”)

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      What is the point of current folding phones? I still fail to grasp that. This, however, seems more clear. It’s a phone that can become a full on tablet. This is a true transformation into an otherwise disparate device. A phone that becomes a slightly bigger phone is the real mystery to me.

      • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Honestly I feel this was always the goal (one of several), but R&D is expensive. Shipping an odd phone that people still buy keeps the shareholders happy while the multi-year research process can eventually produce more usable results.

        Single-flip phones were the awkward teenagers, now this phone can be the 18-20 age young adult, fully featured, but needing refinement. Next gen or the one after this will add a lot more robustness.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        When you try to look at a spreadsheet and there are too many columns even in portrait mode, I open up the phone.

        For some reason nobody figured out “zoom all the way out” functionality on the phone yet

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      When you start needing reading glasses, you’ll know. I have a phone for outside the house and a tablet for home. I would much rather just have one device be both.