ID-Ten-T

Why did you write a comment?

I’m saying that they’re engaging in illegal activities on top of the claim that AI is terrible.

Acting as a victim and seeking to remedy the crime is not unproductive behavior. Is it unproductive for someone involved in a campaign against data center establishment to report their own harm?

What did you explain?

I’ll briefly summarize my argument. It’s telling people who have fallen for big tech propaganda to see the truth.

Hey bud, I know what are you saying. I’m asking this to someone who only wants to criticize, not to think here.

Did I say I’d be releasing a antivirus program? I was trying to explain the principle of detection.

That’s a good judgment. It’s not something you can handle with low intelligence, right?

Isn’t this not it? Like your first comment, whether you’re showing off what you know, explaining, or providing a logical rebuttal… just Run away!?

Ok man. I’m really trying to help you, but you do you. Stay well, friend.

Did you realize that your logic was wrong? You say it’s help, but you express what you wanted to blame so clumsily.

Why does it look like an overly sensitive reaction? Is your help the help of truth? Your comments converge into only one. A good excuse, a facade. Good luck too.

You wrote the comment based on the fact that the LLM chatbot has a problem.

Not a fact. Your supposition.

Then, if there is a problem

Its not a problem, but if you believe it is for you, you have a path to not be affected by it. Don’t interact with it.

is it right to turn away from it?

For you? Sure. You are worried about its affect on you. If you think something is poisonous to you, why would you continue to consume the poision? Wheres the logic in that?

Is it right to solve it?

LLMs aren’t thinking. They cannot “dominate” anyone unless you actively choose to believe the LLM hallucinations as fact. The solution to that belief is to no longer consume it.

You probably left a comment because you wanted to blame me

Blame you for what? You’ve done nothing that affects me negatively.

and you also don’t have to read my post as like your words. Because my post is Text on a screen.

True! I was hoping to appeal to reason and logic with you. If you truly believe what your posted in the OP, then there’s nothing I can do for you except hope you get the help you need. I won’t see any more of your posts. Good luck to you.

So you haven’t even bothered to study or even read deeply about the topic you’re so angry about? Do what you will, but spouting nonsense only detracts from your credibility.

…or are you hallucinating?

What have you studied? And what did you discover and what did you learn? Why should society dismiss the AI hallucination as something beyond our control? Why do we have to adjust or manipulate the weights? Is human intelligence statistics-based? Is your language your intelligence? What do you really know?

I know that - do you? You’re asking a lying machine to prove to you it’s lying.

What is the fundamental reason that you defined a lying machine? That’s proof that you already know there’s a problem too, right?

So, Why LLMs are lying? The lies of a program without [self] are the result of a designed algorithm.

You wrote the comment based on the fact that the LLM chatbot has a problem. Then, if there is a problem, is it right to turn away from it? Is it right to solve it?

You probably left a comment because you wanted to blame me, and you also don’t have to read my post as like your words. Because my post is Text on a screen.

How is your delusional disorder? Don’t you know what’s [delusion] and what’s [reality]? The problem of LLM attacking is already known to the world. You’re distorting the facts by adding that issue to your delusions. Go to the hospital quickly.

And you spoke well about the role-play. Why AI do a role-play? AI is just Software that has neither intelligence nor self. Your delusion is that the real-world AI is personifying a program that neither has intelligence nor a self!

We? why are you saying ‘WE’? What is the basis for it?