

No, quite the opposite. Models are largely a mass of random looking numbers that can’t be compressed losslessly.


No, quite the opposite. Models are largely a mass of random looking numbers that can’t be compressed losslessly.


Hp is doing laptop rental for non-commercial customers only.


This isn’t really about Epstein, at least not the trafficking part of Epstein.
It’s a separate but intertwined issue of appointing someone to the most visible ambassadorship who had been removed from government roles in disgrace on multiple occasions and had known ties to a convicted criminal. In no world is that a good choice, and it led to national secrets being leaked.
He appointed a traitor whilst having sufficient reason to doubt him.


Novramedia is certainly biased. Biased to the left.


He’s only been in the job 5 months. He’s evacuating the blast radius.


Personally, I think this should be done by limiting device functionality. No internet access on devices owned by <insert age limit>. Mobile phones are still fine, but limit them to local functions and being a phone.
I know this requires parents not to provide full fledged devices, but often I think all parents need is a reason to say “no” to something that can’t be argued with.


Which I think is largely what you’re seeing happen. France’s national options are all built on open source for example.


Probably not any harder no, but much higher responsibility. You’ve got a few hundred lives depending on you.


When you reset “secure boot settings” did you clear the TPM contents? Would that have included a. private key used in the disc encryption? Then when you regenerated keys it will have been with a different seed and so different.
I don’t know much about his stuff, but that bit sounded odd to me.


Little of that is really having a big impact on people’s lives.
Being “found to have broken rules” doesn’t have a lot of meaning when the feeling is the rules allow far too much corruption. I’m not aware of any changes to the parliamentary standards.
More health appointments is good, but if you hit a brick wall after your GP visit because the resources aren’t there… well you’re still stuck.
Investigations into water companies? We’re well past that stage. Where are the prosecutions? The evidence existed under previous governments but was ignored.
Nationalisation of the railways may eventually help the commuter class, but not many others. I don’t see why it’s a priority. Railways are functional. Expensive, but functional. Nationalise the water!
And on the other hand people are finding harder and harder to live their lives. Inflation is still rampant and the government cuts support saying their broke.
Of course, that doesn’t stop them inventing a billion pound ID scheme that wasn’t in the manifesto and giving the contracts to foreign tech giants – the money doesn’t even go into the UK. Or to keep trading arms to Israel whilst arresting any protestor that might have a problem with it. Or proposing scrapping trial by jury because they won’t invest in the judicial system. WTF happened to Sir Starmer the Human Rights lawyer.


Adser good. Adser good. It’s Ebenadser Good


I don’t understand this take.
The labour manifesto was titled “Change” and nothing has. The population didn’t want a Blue Labour that continued with cuts and austerity. It wanted Red labour that would introduce new spending plans for infrastructure.
How has the fact that the labour left been excluded from leadership made this clusterfuck their fault?
“…holding the seat…”
So nothing changed?


I think it’s good that he’s gone, but I need to know starmer got rid of him. Not that he offered his resignation, but was asked for it.
Starmer’s judgement on who his advisors are is the key aspect to this.
Edit: just seen this part of his statement:
Secondly, while I did not oversee the due diligence and vetting process…
So, who did?


Why not both?


I’ll give you cinema.
Music!?!?!?


Not really, no.


Just a future looking statement.
Once you get more familiar with the terminal…
I know you’re not there yet, but don’t let the fact that you’ve adopted a particular setup limit you in the future.


Even with a LibDem majority government I don’t think it would be a currency union. They’re rejoiners for sure, but I think it’s to re-establish what was lost. Not go further.
That’s certainly the implication, but I don’t see how you prove that.