All these responses surprise me.

I thought that was straight forward.

Fenben, stuff that many people report eliminating their cancer by, and hempseed, to grow cannabis from, for another thing that has long had people reporting defeating cancer with the help of.

How’s it been interpreted to seem off topic? ??? What are the other interpretations? How did it seem nonsensical but that not cue any query to dispel that?

And that the one question I was asked, also seemed a bit odd, not a strong point to clarify, but I answered it anyway, and got only downvoted for, I presume is what’s being alluded to here with:

Their answer is weird because I thought they were going to answer with something related to the post … but it seems like they are just talking about an unrelated topic.

I answered “feeding the birds”, to clarify the point about hempseed [“feeding the birds” meaning putting cannabis seed out for birds, and if some should germinate on happenstance, … ~ or just code for outdoor guerrilla grows], in case that’s what was being missed about the wink (~ though also… affording cannabis medication … that’s the wink… that these remedies can be cheap [and not needing a for-profit oncology department and pharmaceutical corporation maximising profit]).

I guess curiosity ran short when encountering yet another unfamiliar allusion. Curiosity runs out, time to judge and smear, and put down, because if you couldn’t understand it already, it must be nonsense, huh? Must be bot, huh? Must be mere random, eh? ;)

Well… that was fun. :3