Adhominous contradiction falls a little short of refutation, but maybe you’ve something there but did not share it because you believe your assertion, contrary to my invite, that I’m not happy to hear any refutation.
You started with a flase premise
Where?
and seem to think you have to only answer.
That’s amusing. If you’re willing to entertain the idea, … that sounds like projecting, contrary to the present evidence. Me with an open invitation to more perspectives, and you seeming to bark that down in apparent certainty to know otherwise.
If you think you’re right, go be about it. Be an example.
Implying I’m not walking the talk? Right now? Please do help make that clear where there’s grit in my eye, or what’s in my blind spot, because I’m only seeing as far as I’m seeing, and so merely alluding to there being something falling short in some way, is of null benefit, without saying what it is. Otherwise… kinda just looks like narcissistic insecurity attacking others with pompous airs of superior virtue thinly veiled over gaslighting and misdirection.
I don’t think I’m right. That’s the point. Humility avails curiosity. Ride it long enough, enough discoveries come to dispel certainty, especially naive realism. Or so says my naive ascertainment thus far. Exceptions abound, to every premature generalisation. And isn’t that all we ever have? And there’s always more?
Stay divided. Let the oligarchs win.
All the best divisive groups and agent provocateurs to divide you by.
Genuinely, what the fuck are you even trying to say here?
I’m not going to extend the hand of friendship to someone who wants me and 2/3rds of my family and friends dead just because they aren’t oligarchs.
Ah well. It’s been working well for at least one fella.
Oh fuck of with this. This isn’t an argument in your favour.
Happy to hear any refutation.
No you aren’t. You started with a flase premise and seem to think you have to only answer.
If you think you’re right, go be about it. Be an example.
Adhominous contradiction falls a little short of refutation, but maybe you’ve something there but did not share it because you believe your assertion, contrary to my invite, that I’m not happy to hear any refutation.
Where?
That’s amusing. If you’re willing to entertain the idea, … that sounds like projecting, contrary to the present evidence. Me with an open invitation to more perspectives, and you seeming to bark that down in apparent certainty to know otherwise.
Implying I’m not walking the talk? Right now? Please do help make that clear where there’s grit in my eye, or what’s in my blind spot, because I’m only seeing as far as I’m seeing, and so merely alluding to there being something falling short in some way, is of null benefit, without saying what it is. Otherwise… kinda just looks like narcissistic insecurity attacking others with pompous airs of superior virtue thinly veiled over gaslighting and misdirection.
I don’t think I’m right. That’s the point. Humility avails curiosity. Ride it long enough, enough discoveries come to dispel certainty, especially naive realism. Or so says my naive ascertainment thus far. Exceptions abound, to every premature generalisation. And isn’t that all we ever have? And there’s always more?
That’s a lot of words to say nothing.
Hrmm. Still evasive, gaslighting, arguing tone.
Would have been nice if you could have answered at least one of my questions. Such as “Where?”.
?
The oligarchs are the Nazis. The bourgeoisie bankroll Nazi ideology. Fascism is a pillar of capitalism. We are all unified against Nazis.
Not everything is a false flag. There really are people like that.
And they’re easily roused and deployed.