“Life begins at conception” - “Why?” - “Because that’s when personhood begins” - “Why?” - “Because personhood begins when they are given their souls, at birth”
All you are doing is rotating terms to start back in the beginning.
And all of your arguments hinge on your personal belief. Without your personal belief, all the arguments are null and void.
Life begins at conception as thats when the egg is fertilized, resulting in the formation of a whole different human being with their own personhood and soul
how is it circular reasoning?
“Life begins at conception” - “Why?” - “Because that’s when personhood begins” - “Why?” - “Because personhood begins when they are given their souls, at birth”
All you are doing is rotating terms to start back in the beginning.
And all of your arguments hinge on your personal belief. Without your personal belief, all the arguments are null and void.
Life begins at conception as thats when the egg is fertilized, resulting in the formation of a whole different human being with their own personhood and soul
Take away personal beliefs and supernatural elements and what’s left of your argument?