• deft
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lol that’s a little ironic

      • deft
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        Because you called it a non-aggression pact and then in the next comment talk about how the US does it too.

        But you’re not acknowledging it’s the same mechanism. An empire, a government of mass power plays the messaging game so their imperial goals are shrouded in loyalty and misinformation.

        Russia agreed to spheres of influence, to slicing up Poland and then engaged in violence on another country. You called that a non-aggression pact. Like c’mon man…

        • Mels@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Slicing up Poland? Which were actually Belarusian, Ukrainian, and even Lithuanian lands actually? You should replace the ‘e’ with ‘a’ in your username. Don’t mention that the Polish nationalists frequently committed cultural erasure and programs against the aforementioned peoples, through a process called ‘Polonization’. These lands were overwhelmingly not Polish at all, so you’re not ‘slicing up’ Poland by returning Ukrainian, Belarusian, and Lithuanian lands; which were under active policy of Polonization during the Second Polish Republic, of the 1920s to 1930s.

          **Sorry I was a bit rude at the start