• deft
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nope she has every right. Trying to make things right doesn’t make things right, don’t fuck up and if you do especially as a company pay the fuck up.

    I also dislike that her not wanting a property against her zodiac sign is supposed to suggest craziness. If someone said they didn’t want a house near a cemetery or pork factory for religious reasons we don’t question it, if anything we understand that. Let her have that space too all religions are goofy as fuck.

    • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      The zodiac sign thing sounds like an attempt at making her sound crazy. The company should have done better due diligence on such an important thing.

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Haaaaa. It is crazy.

        Now she has the right to say no for absolutely no reason and I support that but saying no based on astrology is pretty fucking crazy.

        • bitchkat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          It doesn’t matter why she wants what she wants. It only really matters what she wants.

          • Woht24@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re completely right, I just wish I didn’t know the reason because I can’t respect it

        • deft
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Literally all religions though and you’re gonna respect some? Who is the real dummy?

          And if you shoot back saying you believe in nothing you hold no proof and could be just as wrong as every religion. So why act so arrogant and be so judgemental it is literally actually stupid

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m not sure if you’re saying that I’m suggesting that it’s crazy or if you’re just stating it so I’m responding, I’m not saying that it’s crazy one way or the other I’m just stating what she gave as the reason for it

      I think we can both agree that the valid outcome of this will be that the property will be bulldozed but the fact that she hasn’t suggested is herself suggest that she might want the house there she just doesn’t want to pay for it.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        She has no obligation to suggest anything here. And the valid outcome is that they rebulldoze (since they did that when building) de-landscape and then relocate and replant any and all plants. She already has the house, it is crazy to me you can have a take so hot and yet so very wrong.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        How do you know she hasn’t said that is what she wants? For all we know, the company doesn’t want to do that because it will cost them more money.