• Zacryon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thank you for the reference! Learnt something new. As far as I’ve read, the Overton window is not just that, but describes a general window of acceptable ideas or propositions. Of course, influenced by possible (public) majorities.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It does describe a window, yes.

      But the implication is that if you think of the political spectrum between left and right, then the largest 2 parties will always align themselves immediately to the left and the right of the median - the centre point of contemporary politics.

      Move that point (through voting) and you move the policies.

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        This sounds like a fantasy.

        I’ve voted Democrat my whole life, yet the dems keep moving to the right, and the overton window keeps moving to the right along with them.

          • Krono@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes of course, but that’s not really relevant to the broader point here.

            Democrats have won more elections than Republicans, yet they have moved to the right. So what will it take to move them left?

            The person I replied to suggested that voting can move the Dems left, but I disagree. At a national level, the Dems have been captured by corporate money.

            They understand the best way to get votes is through advertising dollars, and the best way to get dollars is corporate fundraising. Other countries call this corruption, but here we call it free speech.

            • Syrc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Democrats have won more elections than Republicans, yet they have moved to the right. So what will it take to move them left?

              They haven’t won enough. If people like Bernie are still losing primaries because “commies won’t win general elections” and Dems still have to go for the “middle-of-the-road” candidate while Republicans can prop up the literal antichrist, that means they still haven’t won enough to cause a shift.

              Once they get enough wins (possibly in a row) that Republicans are the ones forced to go for a “middle-of-the-road” candidate, that’s when Dems will actually have to act as a left wing party to get votes.

              EDIT: also, unless I miscounted, Dems actually have less wins than Republicans post-FDR.

              • Krono@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                So your idea is to keep voting for the corporate Democrats, and eventually the Republicans will moderate themselves in reponse?

                Mate, either you haven’t been paying attention to Republican politics, or you are insane.

                This is a recipe for disaster. We can’t afford to keep this status quo for another generation, we are destroying the planet.

                • Syrc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  We can’t afford to keep this status quo for another generation, we are destroying the planet.

                  And what’s the alternative? I mean, there’s a lot of stuff that can be done, but voting for Biden (or whoever is the leftmost candidate between the main two parties) doesn’t prevent you from doing any of that. You can do that and organize, go to protests and whatnot.

                  • Krono@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Yes we both agree that you can vote and also protest. My argument here was that voting for Dems does not move them left, so I’m not sure how protest is relevant.

                    But since you asked for the alternative, I think the american labor movement of a century ago is the last truly successful model. It required a large peaceful protest movement, various forms of violent direct action, and a broad base of support in the populace who would not be swayed by propaganda. Those who died in that fight earned us the weekend, workplace safety, and dignified retirement. They planted the seeds for the most progressive era in American history.

                    I think we have to reckon with the fact that recent protest movements all failed. George Floyd defunded 0 police departments. The Womens March was a punchline. After Occupy Wall Street, banks and hedge funds just got bigger. Anti-Iraq war protests may have curbed some brutality, but that war continued for 2 decades.

                    These protests are on the right side of history, and changing peoples minds is good, but to change peoples material condition you need to change policy too.