MeldrikMA to Facepalm · 2 years agoThanks, UPS!imagemessage-square98linkfedilinkarrow-up1767arrow-down150
arrow-up1717arrow-down1imageThanks, UPS!MeldrikMA to Facepalm · 2 years agomessage-square98linkfedilink
minus-squareYeetPics@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 years ago house Not quite a high occupancy building imo. Codes are different (and actually enforced) when you have one property owner and dozens if not hundreds of tenants who all can sue the owner at a whim (in the US, anyhow).
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoSituations vary and as satisfying as it is to appear to know it all, one doesn’t due to the large variety of how things are throughout the world.
minus-squareYeetPics@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoThis post gives us a precise situation and the regulations are also very specific. It’s not a hard conclusion to arrive at.
Not quite a high occupancy building imo.
Codes are different (and actually enforced) when you have one property owner and dozens if not hundreds of tenants who all can sue the owner at a whim (in the US, anyhow).
Situations vary and as satisfying as it is to appear to know it all, one doesn’t due to the large variety of how things are throughout the world.
This post gives us a precise situation and the regulations are also very specific.
It’s not a hard conclusion to arrive at.