MeldrikMA to Facepalm · 1 year agoYou couldn't just, like, place the wheelchair at the sides??imagemessage-square75linkfedilinkarrow-up1972arrow-down119file-textcross-posted to: wtf
arrow-up1953arrow-down1imageYou couldn't just, like, place the wheelchair at the sides??MeldrikMA to Facepalm · 1 year agomessage-square75linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: wtf
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·1 year agoWhat would the symbol for “no homeless” look like? A house crossed out twice?
minus-squareRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up27arrow-down1·1 year ago What would the symbol for “no homeless” look like? ✝️
minus-squarecheesymoonshadow@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year ago🏠 inside 🚫 inside another 🚫 ?
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYou could probably just get away with the “no” over the home. “You have no home”, “this is not your home” simultaneously.
minus-squareGelatinGeorge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoThat’s the first time I’ve ever double-taked a sentence before. Nice.
minus-squareflerp@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI’ve seen no camping signs with a tent crossed out and of course no loitering signs are a classic excuse to harass homeless people
What would the symbol for “no homeless” look like? A house crossed out twice?
✝️
You know, in theory
🏠 inside 🚫 inside another 🚫 ?
You could probably just get away with the “no” over the home. “You have no home”, “this is not your home” simultaneously.
That’s the first time I’ve ever double-taked a sentence before. Nice.
I’ve seen no camping signs with a tent crossed out and of course no loitering signs are a classic excuse to harass homeless people