• TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 months ago

    It should be one of patriotism considering the u s military a literally labeled climate change as our greatest existential threat.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I really liked her framing in this part of the speech. Another speaker said it similarly earlier in the week.

    The Republicans fight for freedom of corporations to be deregulated and pollute our environment with reckless abandon.

    The Democrats are fighting for freedom of people to live and be safe in their home environment. Safe to drink water, safe to breathe the air.

    Highlighting the differences in how each party conceives of the notion of freedom could be a huge deciding factor in this election, and for that matter I think it’s critical for Dems to reclaim usage of the word from the republicans who have disfigured its meaning almost beyond recognition.

  • HWK_290@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean, why not? The current tactic of making the catastrophic severity of climate change abundantly clear doesn’t seem to be working on the ignorant American public, or even their homes sliding into the sea or being consumed by wildfires. Whatever works

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve thought for a while that the way to get assholes to change their mind is to appeal to stuff they already believe. They don’t care about the environment or children. Arguing for that stuff isn’t going to land. But if you tell them that like only AMERICA has the POWER to SAVE THE WORLD via TERRA FORMING they’re more likely to be like "America fuck yeah!’

    Belief is largely social for all of us. Unfortunately some people are kind of stupid and hang out in similarly stupid social groups.

  • banshee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Glad to see it! I’m tired of MAGA tarnishing terms that have traditionally held a positive connotation.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    While I’m sure it’s possible, there’s little one can do to be more pro-corporation and less patriotic than be a republican.

  • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They sure are sounding a lot like Republicans with all this talk of patriot and waving USA signs.

      • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, but it does involve blind loyalty, which allows politicians to get away with a bunch of shit

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lol no. Remember here: Democrats just forced a sitting President to not run for re-election

          • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            The donor class forced a sitting president to not run for re election…

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago
    New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for New York Times:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/23/climate/kamala-harris-climate-strategy.html?unlocked_article_code=1.FE4.KyYy._SrLSNFcKoW1

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Commiunism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    This doesn’t make any sense - fighting climate change isn’t some local effort where if you suddenly stop doing CO2 emissions in your country, the country becomes suddenly safe. There needs to be a radical global cooperation for this, there’s no place for patriotism here (in fact, what needs to be done is closer to cosmopolitanism).

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The key is that it can be both. Pushing the “your kids are screwed” message doesn’t seem to be working. If hyping up Americans with patriotic messages gets them moving, I don’t see that as a bad thing.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, it takes global cooperation, but the US is a very visible prosperous high-emissions country, so showing that it can be done in the US is absolutely critical to enabling global cooperation.