This isn’t even a version from their book club. it’s pulled from a court case and not the Bible.
You can do more than that:
It’s also worth paying attention to races further down the ballot; There are lists of close house and close senate races as well as a ton of competitive seats in state legislatures.
There’s usually nothing more than a chain-link fence.
None of that means much of anything if the Supreme Court feels like saying otherwise.
As with the win in Montana, it’s all about Hawaii having a right to a clean and healthful environment in the state constitution:
Section 9. Each person has the right to a clean and healthful environment, as defined by laws relating to environmental quality, including control of pollution and conservation, protection and enhancement of natural resources. Any person may enforce this right against any party, public or private, through appropriate legal proceedings, subject to reasonable limitations and regulation as provided by law. [Add Const Con 1978 and election Nov 7, 1978]
Yeah, there’s a bunch of modeling that shows that fairly small amounts of storage enable 90% or more decarbonization at temperate and tropical latitudes.
A lot is happening though; it looks like Chinese emisions are starting to drop
We’ve likely already shifted from a 4°C world by 2100 to a 3°C by 2100. That’s not enough but it’s also a lot more than nothing.
He’s not now but I think that was the pitch to the billionaires.
The idea was basically that having the name Kennedy and touting his environmental work (from before when a worm ate part of his brain) would suddenly induce a bunch of Democrats to vote for him. So he got to dine with billionaires and they tossed him money.
He wasn’t ever going to get elected; the big question was whether he could serve as a spoiler and help elect Trump.
There article is about a paper showing that there’s a significant increase in aluminum oxide in the atmosphere. The particulates from that are part of how the small amounts of chlorine in the atmosphere are able to destroy ozone.
That Saudi. The plan there seems to be to sell off all the oil, and then have the royal family decamp to a more northern latitude with their harems while the rest of the population cooks to death.
But I want to hear the worm speak!
We’ve got a very good idea because California allows study: gun ownership means you’re a lot more likely to shoot a member of your household than use it in self defense to prevent a killing, as well as much more likely to kill yourself or have a household member kill themlself
As I said elsewhere in the discussion:
In this case, it means that the “independent” expert claiming that guns are frequently used in self-defense is actually paid by them. It’s a common theme when a product is really harmful.
In this case, it means that the “independent” expert claiming that guns are frequently used in self-defense is actually paid by them. It’s a common theme when a product is really harmful.
That’s not true at all; they’re burning more than the US is now, by a fair bit. The US has a lot of historical cumulative emissions, but China is close to overtaking those.
We are doing things, just not yet enough.