As governor he got his state signed on to the national popular vote interstate compact

  • Zorg@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Congress of going to need to expand a little bit, if all 3,330-6,660 reps should be able to gather at the same time.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      This would be a problem if it were 1924, but we’re living in 2024. The solutions for this are right in front of us and have been for decades. Get all these guys and gals on a secure teleconference and turn the Capitol building into a museum, or renovate it to have smaller private offices.

      There, now we can get 10,000 reps in if we need to. The bigger concern is how are they going to decide who gets to speak with that many representatives. They can’t realistically give everybody equal floor time and expect government to be anything other than completely paralyzed. So the number probably still needs to be capped, but it should be capped at a value where whatever the state that has the lowest population sets the value at 1 and every other state divides their population by that number to figure out how many representatives they get.

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        There was an article (Archive Link) in The Washington Post discussing the nuts and bolts of how expanded representation could work. It wouldn’t be hard.

        A quote from the article: To my surprise and delight, the team’s last proposal reveals that we could actually take the House of Representatives up to 1,725 members without having to construct a new building.