• FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      They’ve been doing that for about the last 6 releases. I wish they’d fix some of the long-standing annoying bugs like the fact that you can’t respect .gitignore and search in a subdirectory at the same time. Or the fact that you can’t stage a submodule unless you also have that submodule open.

      Or how about a less annoying way to configure Run/Debug than launch.json?

      Still, can’t complain. It’s mostly free and still very good overall. I’ll definitely be watching Zed… but maybe not too closely until it supports opening large files.

    • nebeker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      An open source-ish corporate product is valuable in so much as it’s a vehicle for a paid service, right?

    • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      I wonder if the slowdown in non-ai features this release was influenced in some way by their migration away from AMD modules to ES modules.

      Putting myself in their shoes and taking codemods into account, I wouldn’t want to make a big feature and have to worry about AMD/ES module concerns. Why do that when instead I could get a bunch of checking and smaller (but non headline) tasks out of the way and get back onto the larger features in 1-2 months after the ES modules are proven to work and I don’t have to worry about rolling back changes.

      Either that, or sometimes by statistical eventuality we end up with changes (which all take a different time to be completed) just not being released within a small period of time.