No like seriously, I get that the admins work for free but FOSS is supposed to be about freedom and making products that everyone can benefit from yet still the bias is simply hilarious sometimes and concerning usually.
For the record, I’m talking about conflicts of different opinions here, not justifying hate speech or extremism. I know there is a major difference between FOSS and Big Data in terms of treatment of troll behavior (with the latter supporting it because it generates engagement), but it is clearly being misunderstood and abused now.
I even think I’d rather recommend proprietary options to others at this point because of mental health risks. Yes, I know that some major platforms are quite heavily biased politically (with X even being accused in supporting fascism) but it’s not as bad as being biased in everything imo.
Can’t we finally understand that the modern trends in most cultures praise exclusiveness (often cleverly disguised as distorted inclusiveness which sounds impossible but is actually a case and it hurts people’s understanding of the latter) and work against it? Or at least we could do it for the FOSS reputation.
On the positive note though, Mastodon that is probably the biggest FOSS social platform seems to be pretty good (though probably a bit too close to the Big Data in terms of troll treatment). Could it be because of the size?
I dunno what you’ve been smoking, but compared to any of the corporate sites/services, moderation bias is unusually low. The times it does crop you are much more limited, unless you’re on one of the known propaganda instances of Lemmy or Mastodon. But that’s still an improvement over corporate services since it’s a much smaller area of power
Well I’m glad you haven’t experienced it on the platforms you use. I personally did (and it’s not just about Lemmy and Mastodon) and saw others reporting it so that’s why my opinion is different. Though I agree it’s not always the case and some instances/platforms can be better than others.
Fair enough :)
