Summary

The Supreme Court’s hearing of Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton signals potential limits on First Amendment protections for online pornography.

The case involves a Texas law mandating age verification for websites with “sexual material harmful to minors,” challenging the 2004 Ashcroft v. ACLU precedent, which struck down similar laws under strict scrutiny.

Justices, citing the inadequacy of modern filtering tools, seemed inclined to weaken free speech protections, exploring standards like intermediate scrutiny.

The ruling could reshape online speech regulations, leaving adults’ access to sexual content uncertain while tightening restrictions for minors.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Just saying, the shit you can find on the Internet does not come even close to what Hustler was. There is instant access to all kinds of weird and fucked fetish shit that just wasn’t accessible in the 90s and earlier.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Bizarre fetish shit was very much available in the 90s and earlier. It just wasn’t in hustler or playboy.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      There’s a vid on archive.org of the Spice Channel that must have been off someone’s VHS tape. It flickers a lot and is barely watchable, but I was curious what we were all missing back then.

      Turns out, way more softcore than I was expecting. Slightly more hardcore than Skinamax at the time, but not by much.