VirtualBox is ridiculously simple to set up and get virtual machines going. Shared folders, shared clipboard and much more are no issue.

But.

It eats resources. The installed virtual machines (VM) run relatively slow. What have you found to be feature comparable - and most importantly more resource-efficient - alternatives for running VMs under Linux?

  • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I agree. The only feature where I’d say it’s weaker feature-wise is it doesn’t have any form of virtual GPU acceleration - either you deal with software rendering or have to pass through a graphics card (I’ve done it, but it’s not easy.).

    Otherwise, I’d say it tends to run better than VirtualBox, though it’s been years since I last used Vbox anyhow. A plus is Virt Manager comes in most distro repos, whereas VirtualBox doesn’t. Also, it allows you to directly edit the XML, so you can do some cool stuff that would be really annoying (not impossible) to do in VirtualBox.

    • Einar@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s my struggle with this solution as well.

      Still, a solid choice.

    • cole@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      actually, you can do vulkan passthrough if the guest machine is also linux