You said they got it wrong and it was a corrupt ruling. I’m curious where you think the law went against what they ruled, in other words, how did they interpret the law ‘corruptly’
I asked you to expand on your wild claim, you couldn’t.
I was trying to learn your position and potentially go on your side if you had a solid argument. 1 thing you’re right about is me not having an opinion on if the court is corrupt or not, because I don’t have any information saying they’re corrupt. I wanted to learn your argument, but you failed to convince me, and likely anybody else, with you’ve mentioned.
Yeah, they interpret it.
You said they got it wrong and it was a corrupt ruling. I’m curious where you think the law went against what they ruled, in other words, how did they interpret the law ‘corruptly’
@MasterObee No.
I don’t find your argument convincing if you can’t find any ‘corrupt’ court cases then.
@MasterObee You’re an agent provocateur. No need to convince you. You don’t hold your own opinion on anything.
I asked you to expand on your wild claim, you couldn’t.
I was trying to learn your position and potentially go on your side if you had a solid argument. 1 thing you’re right about is me not having an opinion on if the court is corrupt or not, because I don’t have any information saying they’re corrupt. I wanted to learn your argument, but you failed to convince me, and likely anybody else, with you’ve mentioned.