Would there be an interest with consolidating with the !hardware@lemmy.world community?

This one has more subs, but a lot less engagement and it seems the mod for this community deleted their account?

  • drspod@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 days ago

    No thank you. Consolidation is antithetical to how the fediverse works. I would rather just have a new active mod(s) in this community.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      Relax, there is no need to be preachy.

      I created a thread to get feedback, if there is no interest that’s fine.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 days ago

        You asked for opinions, and you got one; a polite one at that. And you call it preachy?

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 days ago

            I saw their other comment, in response to another post you made on the same topic. They are simply reiterating their opinion a second time.

            • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              And that’s why I said there is no need to be preachy. What don’t you understand about this?

              I asked a very specific question regarding instance policies around consolidation for ML.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    .world is run terribly, and is already very bloated, so no.

  • MeldrikA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    These things usually happens organically. Eventually one or two communities (with the same name) will be the only ones left.

    And honestly, I believe if starting/moving a community, it’s better not to do it on the biggest servers.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I get it it’s just that we have three hardware communities on different instances all with zero differentiation in terms of thematics.

      I don’t mind having multiple communities, but it’s best when they offer a different angle on the same topic. Gaming vs. PC Gaming vs. Retrogaming. Specialized genre-focused communities and so on…

      • MeldrikA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        I agree. I don’t see why “Hardware” need to exist multiple places.

        • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Communities with a different angle (regional, focus) on the same topic are great. I personally don’t see the point in multiple identical communities with zero differentiation, but that’s just me.

  • subby@preferred.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    Given that LW is “too big” and can be a bit buggy at times, and ML is a general-purpose instance with an unmodded community, I’d argue that consolidation should be from LW and ML and towards programming.dev if anything. It’s the right size, and it matches thematically. Usually, when people are proposing consolidation, it’s away from LW, not towards it.

    I’ve no strong opinion on the pros and cons of shutting down ‘other communities’ - I just collect similar communities in a Feed, and see all the posts that way: e.g. https://preferred.social/f/hardware - it’s maybe better to wait until Lemmy implements a similar feature, to avoid the inevitable arguments.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    No need. Multiple communities provide redundancy against instance failure, just like instances provide redundancy. If .world is dead tomorrow for whatever reason, even temporarily, I’d post an article here, or vice versa. People subscribed to both would see my post in either case. If I were more diligent, I’d even cross-post to both when both instances are up. Then none of my posts would be lost if one of the instances goes. Subscribing to multiple communities of the same name/type is the norm on Lemmy. There’s no need for same-name communities to be unique, quite the opposite.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Programming.dev seems like a good option.

    Since this is meta… however this ends up getting resolved could be a good template for consolidating multiple sparse communities across the Fediverse into a single, more populated one.

  • kixik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m just wondering if having the right mods here at lemmy.ml would be attractive enough for the lemmy.world community to consolidate here at lemmy.ml?