Yet another win for Systemd.

  • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m happy that this is coming to linux (I believe Nutanix has a great method to expose storage over IPs), but I would have liked if this was a bit more project/dependence agnostic.

    • Kata1yst@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, it specifically is giving support for booting disks over an existing protocol to systemd. That’s pretty well within scope?

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Oh, my gripe is not with Poettering creating a systemd service for it (for I cannot dispute that systemd wrappers such as this does make life somewhat easier), but I would have liked perhaps a more distribution agnostic method of running NVMe-TCP in a way that the OS would not have to be booted. I suppose I do understand the community’s support for this: systemd is used by most of the popular distributions, and writing a service in it will enable systemd to maybe interleave this between other processes and perhaps fulfill the goal of producing a block device on an L3 network without booting userland.

        As one can probably surmise, I do not have a great understanding of how the process works - will have to figure out how MacOS did it first, and then about how Poettering implemented it. I think I’ll have a better idea of what the solution is geared towards.

        Thanks for your comment!