• tacosplease@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean. Antivax bullshit is more than enough to disqualify him immediately for any sane voter. Why would someone spend any additional time learning about his other opinions?

    • PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Thats… pretty sad. So lets say there was a candidate that had all your ideal solutions except they were what you consider antivax, that person is no longer a good candidate?

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I reject the premise.

        It’s impossible for them to have all my ideal solutions because that would necessarily include supporting medical science.

        Being an outspoken antivaxxer shows a severe lack of critical thinking skills. Vaccines are not what matters most to me - having a representative that accepts reality is.

        • PatFusty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          All i said was to suspend some disbelief. Lets pretend this candidate was a doctor themselves but had a rational take on why they are antivax.

          • tacosplease@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Suspend disbelief in what? Whether vaccines work? Pretend they really do cause autism?

            Ok yeah in bizarro universe I may be interested in an antivaxxer’s opinions. And Superman is a bad guy. Puppies aren’t cute…

            How is that useful? We live in a reality where vaccines do work. They don’t cause autism. And puppies are cute AF.