I’m planning to rebuild my gaming PC (Specs so far: Ryzen 5 7600, B650 chipset, RTX 3060, Dan Case A4).

Yet, I’m not sure which OS it will be. Important features will most probably be:

  • low latency kernel
  • decent hardware support (GPU driver should support the kernel without the need of compiling everything manually)
  • modern looks, rather than a 2003-style xfce configuration
  • still having the freedom to modify and install anything I want
  • olafurp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Low latency kernel you get on all distros.

    Hardware support for GPUs in based on compositor. X11 supports them better but Wayland is faster, both are available on most popular distros and swappable via a logout login.

    Modern looks can be done with desktop environments like KDE and Gnome. Both are good, but KDE is more customisable.

    If you don’t want to compile stuff yourself every now and then then choose Ubuntu or Fedora based distro.

    Having the freedom to install anything you want is a fun requirement. If you mean literally anything then Vanilla OS might suit you since you can use all package managers but you get less modern features with it. This gives you 20 year old apps stuff that only works on some fringe dead on. If not that extreme then Ubuntu based is a bit better than Fedora based in those situations.

    Ubuntu is nice and all but you’ll have to follow a guide to add flatpak support otherwise a very good distro.

    So here’s a suggestion list from me:

    • KDE Neon (Ubuntu based on LTS versions)
    • Fedora (Gnome or KDE variants)
    • VanillaOS (if edge cases)
    • PopOS (New kid on the block. It’s just nice)

    I recommend downloading whatever interests you and start them up in a VM.

  • serpineslair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I personally use arch with i3 window manager. Before anyone says anything, no, this isn’t another “I use arch btw” gag. It is fast, highly customisable, barebones and in my experience i3-wm works great with games which have fullscreen/windowing issues as it is easy to toggle between full screen and move windows about. For example, Gmod kept sticking in between my two monitors on Ubuntu and wouldn’t let me move the window. With i3, you can move containers around with ease. Plus if your arch installation breaks it is almost always your fault. I also have better performance than when I was using Ubuntu.

  • haych@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m a big Pop!_OS fan. Based on Ubuntu so great for following guides and comparability. But no Snap, Flatpak is installed, the OS looks fantastic and runs smooth and gaming on it has been great.

    It’s so underrated but it’s my favourite OS.

    • Bri Guy @sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      +1 for Pop_OS. They also have a version with Nvidia driver support out of the box. Their UI is also a fantastic edited version of GNOME, so it’s sleek and easy to use

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        +2 for pop os

        I thought Ubuntu was the best distro to get started as a gamer but it required so much tinkering. Pop like mentioned had Nvidia installed and with flatpak integration it just made everything honestly fun again

        • zipsglacier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Another happy pop user here! The business model for system76 is basically to make a distro that works seamlessly on the hardware they sell. Side benefit: their distro also works seamlessly on a bunch of other modern hardware, and they pay a lot of attention to quality of life features that make hardware customers happy.

  • WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nobara! It is awesome for gaming and performsnce intensive tasks and beside being an obscure distro is maintained by reputable people (glorious eggroll, proton GE creayor)

  • Potajito@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I use endeavour os. Is arch made easy, while still being arch. It fills your needs, you can install any DE you like (kde myself) and a zen kernel with basically one command line. Also for nvidia if you go that way you just do “nvidia-inst” and are good to go. Another nice one that checks those boxes is nobara, a fedora spin focused on gaming.

  • nublug@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    endeavourOS kde is gorgeous and by far the most stable and ready-out-of-the-box arch version i’ve tried.

    also the eos-packagelist --install [desktop environment] command lets you install the other endeavourOS themed DEs or WMs just like the distro installer does so you don’t have to reinstall or work on themes yourself if you want to change after install.

    pipewire is also ready to go and i think it uses some kind of realtime thing, but i’m using the default kernel so i don’t know that it’s a low latency kernel level thing by default.

    games have also been top notch for me, the only tweaking i’ve done is adding -vulkan launch options to steam games.

    overall i highly recommend it. i’m using kde but tried cinnamon, i3, and sway (though community editions like sway are going unsupported soon) and they are all similarly well-themed.

  • ADonkeyBrainedFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve been using arch exclusively for years now. Pacman and the wiki are just too good for me to go elsewhere. I’ve used Gnome and Kde both extensively and I just like Gnome more. Kde just has a lot of jank that doesn’t make it feel like a modern system imo. Gnome is a much smoother experience. Both work perfect for gaming though. Just started experimenting with hyprland this week and I’ve been loving it. It has some weird stuff with running games, but that just might be user error. I have friends who swear by mint too which I haven’t seen mentioned in this thread much.