• Peanut@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    bitcoin never had a use other than “will become valuable?”

    many (myself included) believe this technology will probably be the only one that will develop fast enough to actually help with the climate crisis.

    optimizing research and academia as well as environmental issues through information processing. people are excitedly talking about automated proof-checking and context finders that can sift through hundred of papers while you check your coffee. this stuff is good for science and science is good for environmentalism. maybe go after the politicians and companies that are not possibly going to be a benefit in the struggle against environmental collapse.

    why do people keep relating it to bitcoin? because it uses GPUs? that’s literally the only connection.

    somehow people have associated it with crypto and NFTs as if they are even mildly related. perhaps because those things are easier to hate, so why not associate them.

    • juergen@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think this is the wrong direction of trying to solve the climate catastrophe - as long as Big companies continue their egoistical greed for money, climate catastrophe will accelerate. As those big companies won’t choose inconvenient but necessary solutions, they have to be forced by the state. If money is even a small amount of motivation, it is greenwashing.

      We have to kill capitalism. This is the only solution which lets society focus on society instead of money.

      • Peanut@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        that’s definitely the best bet, although i feel AI tools being used by the people who actually want to fix the environment are going to have more success than those asking the people in power to change the system or themselves.

        although if you have ideas on that front i’m all for it.

        i just don’t believe the anti-AI fanti-nerdAI-bro fad is really helping… anyone, in any way.

    • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      We already have at least a century of research telling us that burning fossil fuels leads to climate change. What’s AI going to do at this point?

      • Peanut@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        give us a way to fix the issue without relying on the idiots at the top being decent human beings.

        if you can fix that issue then we wouldn’t have so much of a problem.

        i’d expect AI to help through information processing for research and engineering. current AI tools are already useful to many as co-pilot tools. not everyone is creative enough to get use out of AI, but we are moving towards being able to dictate and gesture in natural language to optimize some things that may have taken a lot more time. it’s also valuable for certain efforts in optimization and engineering. does everyone hate alphafold now too?

        i think a lot of the AI hate right now is from the fact that it takes thought and creative use to get the most out of available tools. as we all learned, if it isn’t already “AGI” it’s 100% useless for everything forever.