fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Geography@mander.xyzEnglish · 11 months agoCalifornia's third largest city is mostly empty roadswww.sfgate.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down13
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkCalifornia's third largest city is mostly empty roadswww.sfgate.comfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Geography@mander.xyzEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareladicius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-211 months agoPlanned for 400.000 people? Third largest city in California? 400k isn’t even much in European standards. I don’t get that claim.
minus-squareZeroCooler@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·11 months agoPer the article it’s the “third largest by land area.”
minus-squareDudewitbow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoIt might be by size and not by population, as there are several cities in California that surpass 400k people
minus-squareares35@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agodefinitely by area. it’s “larger” than san jose, but with a million fewer people.
minus-squarexeekei@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoYea, I’m pretty sure I’ve heard of San Diego being referred to as California’s 3rd largest city.
Planned for 400.000 people? Third largest city in California?
400k isn’t even much in European standards. I don’t get that claim.
Per the article it’s the “third largest by land area.”
It might be by size and not by population, as there are several cities in California that surpass 400k people
definitely by area. it’s “larger” than san jose, but with a million fewer people.
Yea, I’m pretty sure I’ve heard of San Diego being referred to as California’s 3rd largest city.