But we can’t talk about the “murder” because then that’s me being a debate bro, even as you tacitly admit to it being bullshit in the comments (Stalin not sending you enough bullets is not the same as shooting you, sorry!)
But we can’t talk about the “murder” because then that’s me being a debate bro
Yes, why do you think I owe you a discussion? Y’all are a bunch of entitled motherfuckers. Just calle me a “radlib” in your dunk tank and it’s good no?
Owe, owe, owe. You keep using that word, but I don’t think I have. My argument is not that you owe anything, it’s that if we are to pretend you are acting in good-faith, then there must be a healthy way for disagreement to exist (see you model the opposite in your title, how those dang tankies hate dissent). What I dislike is parading around completely fatuous claims and treating objections as pathological.
I fucking let you mother truckers run amok in my space to disagree like a bunch of toxic monkeys. If that’s not leaving space for “healthy disagreement” I don’t know what is!
But that’s not enough is it? No if you don’t debate me specifically it’s not enough.
But you point to everything said as pathology and evidence of evil, and it’s unclear that any other disagreeing responses would have been met more kindly.
What? I don’t point to “everything said”. I pointed 2 things. Entitled sealions like you who didn’t take no for an answer and just became a toxic af (as sealions are wont to do) and the hexbear mob which came here to support said sealions with harassment.
I don’t trust tankies. I believe that they will betray anarchists in every revolution. Y’all attitude here hasn’t helped. But I was perfectly capable of talking to you people like awoo who didn’t try to sealion me.
But to just go on collective campaign of harassment because I don’t trust y’all and dare to express this publicly and then tell me I’m being unreasonable in my reaction . Like what?
“The tankie was rude to me when I accused him of having an ideology of senseless murder, his rudeness proves we shouldn’t have a political coalition”
And the murder too
But we can’t talk about the “murder” because then that’s me being a debate bro, even as you tacitly admit to it being bullshit in the comments (Stalin not sending you enough bullets is not the same as shooting you, sorry!)
Yes, why do you think I owe you a discussion? Y’all are a bunch of entitled motherfuckers. Just calle me a “radlib” in your dunk tank and it’s good no?
There’s a reason why the term sealion exists.
Owe, owe, owe. You keep using that word, but I don’t think I have. My argument is not that you owe anything, it’s that if we are to pretend you are acting in good-faith, then there must be a healthy way for disagreement to exist (see you model the opposite in your title, how those dang tankies hate dissent). What I dislike is parading around completely fatuous claims and treating objections as pathological.
I fucking let you mother truckers run amok in my space to disagree like a bunch of toxic monkeys. If that’s not leaving space for “healthy disagreement” I don’t know what is!
But that’s not enough is it? No if you don’t debate me specifically it’s not enough.
But you point to everything said as pathology and evidence of evil, and it’s unclear that any other disagreeing responses would have been met more kindly.
What? I don’t point to “everything said”. I pointed 2 things. Entitled sealions like you who didn’t take no for an answer and just became a toxic af (as sealions are wont to do) and the hexbear mob which came here to support said sealions with harassment.
I don’t trust tankies. I believe that they will betray anarchists in every revolution. Y’all attitude here hasn’t helped. But I was perfectly capable of talking to you people like awoo who didn’t try to sealion me.
But to just go on collective campaign of harassment because I don’t trust y’all and dare to express this publicly and then tell me I’m being unreasonable in my reaction . Like what?
“Why are people bothered by being called butchers!?!?!”