https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

Many of us do not trust Facebook and anything it is associated with or swallows up.

EDIT:

https://techcrunch.com/2023/07/05/adam-mosseri-says-metas-threads-app-wont-have-activitypub-support-at-launch/

"Instagram head Adam Mosseri said "

““Soon, you’ll be able to follow and interact with people on other fediverse platforms, such as Mastodon. They can also find people on Threads using full usernames, such as @mosseri@threads.net.””

“We’re committed to building support for ActivityPub, the protocol behind Mastodon, into this app. We weren’t able to finish it for launch given a number of complications that come along with a decentralized network, but it’s coming,” he said.

“If you’re wondering why this matters, here’s a reason: you may one day end up leaving Threads, or, hopefully not, end up de-platformed. If that ever happens, you should be able to take your audience with you to another server. Being open can enable that.”

  • nap6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like this is entirely against Lemmy.world’s ethos of “a general-purpose Lemmy instance of various topics, for the entire world to use” (emphasis mine). I for one joined this instance exactly because they didn’t have a ban-happy federation policy like some of the other big ones. I understand people’s concerns, but if you want a “fuck corporations” walled garden instance, I feel like there are better homes for you somewhere else…

  • ayyndrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have done a little bit of reading but I’m still not sure what the issue is. Is it that Threads will take over and defacto become the entire Fediverse? Because I think that would happen whether or not Mastoson/Lemmy instances choose to defederate. Is privacy the concern, and if so, wouldn’t it only affect people using Threads?

    • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One concern would be:

      1. Say Lemmy/kbin grows organically to 1 million users.
      2. Threads federates, with 100 million users

      Do you want these users flooding Lemmy? I don’t want to be biased at the theoretical type of user on Threads, though if the right wingers/trolls/extremists migrate to Threads because they think it’s “more open” then that may be an issue. If it’s full of soccer moms posting pictures of their kids, or karens complaining about everything, that may be an issue.

      Multiculturalism is great, I want to hear new ideas, though some areas are breeding grounds for lower-think, it seems. This probably sounds prejudiced or elitist.

      I want to talk to the vanguard people who take the risk and are openminded and come to lemmy, not necessarily the “lemmings” who join facebook because they love facebook and don’t want to, or can’t, delve deeper into why facebook is one of the worst forces in media at the moment.

      I am not prejudiced (I hope) against “regular people” and “soccer moms”, though think that if 10 million soccer moms came here, the discussions may not be as… interesting, as they are.

      Also, I don’t know what lemmy instances will think about downloading masses of data from threads.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think this will be pretty manageable by finding and using communities that are well-run and have explicit rules and standards of behavior that are enforced. If a community is explicitly meant for serious conversations about, I dunno, music theory, that is enforceable, and if Suburban Subaru Sarah actually wants to join in on that, all the better, but pics of her kid’s soccer game will belong in a different space, just as much as pics of some nerd’s Warcraft raid do too.

        • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure. However, you can’t trust meta, so anything that is done I hope has several failbacks and get-out clauses.

      • italics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I donate money to this platform because I want an open and free internet. I want that for anyone who wants to partake. I don’t want extremists, sure - but I think the “soccer moms” you are referring to are really just your average internet consumer. If we don’t agree on that, that’s fine - I’m happy to move to an instance that’s not as restrictive. I think that’s the beauty of the fediverse. I think it’s ironic when you talk about wanting open minded people to join the instance though lol.

        • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have nothing against “soccer moms”, I just don’t want to see endless photos of their kids, which may be ironic since there’s shitposting on all social networks. Perhaps we’d be able to ignore those communities, however it’ll leak over to other communities.

          It seemed to be “fine” when “those” sorts of “regular folk” stuck to facebook for their fix of sharing their lives.

          Anyway, this aspect isn’t the main point, I’d say - it’s that one cannot trust facebook, and if they want to federate, it cannot be good for us.

          • Maxcoffee@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Personally I don’t care about the soccer moms, my main concern is all the problems that come with being a mainstream social media platform. Threads threatens to overwhelm the content being generated with all those problems where your Lemmy feed is just going to represent Instagram etc again. Screw that.

            • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s exactly what I’m talking about when using the generic “soccer moms” - mainstream twitter/facebook posts.

              I’m probably confusing myself as I have nothing against “normal people”, and want them to discus sthings, and I’m sure there could be a lot of good discussions that could be had with “normal people”, though being drowned by mainstream media posts is the main issue, as you say.

          • ccunning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it would be easy enough to unsubscribe to the EndlessMoppets community and only subscribe to communities that curate Moppetless posts.

            As far as leaking over goes, I never had a problem with EndlessMoppets leaking into any of the subs I did subscribe to over on Reddit.

            And for what it’s worth Lemmy is not encrypted so it would be silly to think Meta isn’t already vacuuming up all this content already.

  • CreeperODeath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have some mixed feelings about this

    But (and don’t hate me for this) If theads joins the fediverse it could actually bring a large user base over

    And ofcourse once meta gets greedy the fediverse should do what it’s designed for and prevent any large company from owning the fediverse

    It could also convince a decent portion of the threads userbase to move over to lemmy or mastodon much easier then they would of been able to in the past since they will already be so close

    Tl;Dr Allow meta into the fediverse but if it’s shit then defederate them aka do what this system was designed for

  • LemmynySnicket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they have any access to data through federation they could have just quitely made a small instance and stolen all the data. So while I 100% won’t be creating an account over there, and might block the instances myself, I don’t see the need to proactively do it.

    • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mastodon and Lemmy are linked (you can see replies form mastodon users and posts), and if threads joins then we are all linked.

  • A_Toasty_Strudel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, I feel like u/ruud is gonna see these comments and keep Zuck out of things. He seems like he cares about what’s going on up in here.

    • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they are going to block it, I would have thought they have decided that already, though seems like mastodon’s head agreed - how much was he paid, I wonder.

        • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it is not-naive to assume that the ridiculously wealthy Meta, which is known to purchase smaller companies, has met with the much smaller mastodon and offered them money. It may be cynical, however it is not-naive.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mastodon’s head can’t choose who individual instances federate with. I think he’s in charge of like, one? How many people in this thread have already shown they have no clue how federation works?

        • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, that is why I’m asking the admins of lemmy.world if they are going to block it.

          Also, this is the largest mastrodon server that is likely federating with threads, so not a small deal.

          • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t see what people are afraid of. Lemmy.world can do what it wishes, but I honestly don’t see where the fear comes in. At the very least just mark it invisible. Let those other users see what other alternatives are out there.

            What problem are you trying to fix by blocking them before even seeing what it’s like (without using some vague notions)?

            Will it even natively federate with this format? Just as Mastodon doesn’t default to trying to display posts in its feed and Kbin doesn’t by default show Mastodon or PixelFed, etc. You might be worrying over nothing.

            Your server federated with Mastodon instances. I’m assuming you aren’t inundated with Mastodon posts.

            • YellowtoOrange@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              As long as lemmy.world blocks it, it’s not an issue - for us anyway, I hope. Though meta are devious - you need to be watchful.

  • Strolleypoley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s very simple. Facebook/meta bullshit on here and I am moving to -tildes.

    Fuck corporations. I hope they all burn and I hope their creators and their born and unborn offspring get cancer and die.

  • Haha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To me it’s simple. If Zuck has a part in this, I will find somewhere else to go.