Mac@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoGoOnprogramming.devimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1711arrow-down137
arrow-up1674arrow-down1imageGoOnprogramming.devMac@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-square0xD@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down3·1 year agoIPv6 is not made with internal networks in mind lol
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·1 year agoNever claimed it was, please quote me where I said as much
minus-squaredohpaz42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·1 year agoMy dude, you used the 10.xx private IP as an example. Why wouldn’t they assume you were referring to internal networks?
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI thought it was pretty clear with me adding 13.37 that I was making a joke, the earlier post spoke about how just adding one octet would still be too few addresses, so I joked about adding one more octet.
minus-squaredohpaz42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI’m only pointing out why the other poster would make the assumption you were referring to an internal network. Do with it what you will.
IPv6 is not made with internal networks in mind lol
Never claimed it was, please quote me where I said as much
My dude, you used the 10.xx private IP as an example. Why wouldn’t they assume you were referring to internal networks?
I thought it was pretty clear with me adding 13.37 that I was making a joke, the earlier post spoke about how just adding one octet would still be too few addresses, so I joked about adding one more octet.
I’m only pointing out why the other poster would make the assumption you were referring to an internal network. Do with it what you will.