• AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    11 months ago

    U.S. vehicle fuel efficiency standards administered by NHTSA have encouraged automakers to build larger vehicles. The bigger the vehicle, the lower the fuel efficiency target it has to meet.

    That’s some monkeys paw type of shit law

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah preverse incentives. When doing the wrong thing makes the most sense for the individual. Happens often in tragedy of the commons situations.

      If you hit a pedestrian it is better for you that they die. If you find an endangered animal on your land it is better for you to kill it. If you have a child with someone who makes minimum wage it is better for you to divorce.

      Maybe it is too much to expect but for things like this, when public policy experts came up with a standard instead of just inheriting a situation, that they plan for these things in advance. Spend a few moments and look at where the incentives are before just hammering a new policy into place.

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If you hit a pedestrian it is better for you that they die

        Uh maybe in China. I would not say that in the United States. Manslaughter is a serious charge.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          You aren’t factoring in civil suits. Someone dead, their family can only get so much. Someone crippled can just keep going after you and might have to as they go into greater and greater levels of debt. What would you do if suddenly your income went down to about 14k USD a year and with each passing day the chances of you returning to work diminished, wouldn’t you be desperate enough to try to win some money from the person who did this to you? Wouldn’t you go along with any shyster lawyer who promised results?

    • Windshear@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Recently bought a new diesel silverado 3500 for my ranch. It’s enormous, I’m glad I didn’t get the dually option as it’s hard enough to drive in the city. Most of its job however is pulling trailers around.

      That said, on highway if I drive the speed limit and take it easy I can get 9L/100km. It’s unreal that such a huge truck will get almost the same economy as our KIA SUV.

      • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I didn’t think that sounded right so I looked it up; Chevrolet themselves say it’s between 11 and 12 litres/100km

        I don’t know what Kia you have, but their diesel Sorento SUV averages 6-7 litres/100km, nearly half what your tiny-penis truck uses

        Funny also that people pull trailers in every country in the world using much smaller trucks without a problem

        You don’t need that truck, same way as nobody else on the planet, no matter what their profession, needs it

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You don’t need that truck, same way as nobody else on the planet, no matter what their profession, needs it

          Please stop this bullshit. There are most certainly reasons to own a truck that can haul big things. Including in Europe. It’s just that 90% of the trucks you see in a Costco parking lot don’t need to be that way.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s Regulatory Capture. Laws made by and for the industry they’re supposed to regulate.