• SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it went like this:

    Mods make thier subs private in protest

    Mods get threatened to lose mod powers if they dont reopen thier subs

    Mods reopen thier subs but only as nsfw subs

    Admins decide to intervene by disabling nsfw

    Admins accidentally (or on purpose idk) disable nsfw on porn subs

    • SeriV@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To add to that, if a sub is tagged as nsfw, there are no ads (to not scare of advertisers). Some sub mods indirectly invited users to post porn, so they became nsfw subs by protest.

      • peef ಠ_ಠ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was great thinking IMO. They just care about the advertisements and investors. They don’t care about who will watch what content.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It sounds like they’re just removing the NSFW tag site-wide instead of using the manpower to manually check each sub to see if it was NSFW before the protests.
      What a fucking fumble, using the iron fist approach on the people who supply and moderate literally all of their content for free surely won’t have any repercussions.

    • Tibert@compuverse.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s porn subs.

      Some subs went to allow NSFW (and porn) as protest, as you said, and reddit admins disabled the NSFW tag on those subs which decided to allow porn and become NSFW.

      And so disabled the NSFW warning on porn posts.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by imcompetence.”

      ¿Por que no los dos?