geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlBanned from community to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoFake News. Get your Fake News here.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up1253arrow-down110cross-posted to: ManufacturingConsent@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1243arrow-down1imageFake News. Get your Fake News here.lemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlBanned from community to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square31linkfedilinkcross-posted to: ManufacturingConsent@lemmy.ml
minus-squarenova_ad_vitum@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 year agoBecause when provided with positive evidence of obvious bias, you demanded proof of a negative which is ranges from prohibitively difficult to impossible. This is not a valid form of reasoning. The inability to disprove something is not a valid reason to believe in it. Let me put it another way, I don’t converse with paedophiles so I’m going to need proof that you’ve never diddled kids before we can continue.
minus-squaredrolex@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down16·1 year agoIt was hardly evidence. It was a quip. Let me put it another way, I don’t converse with paedophiles so I’m going to need proof that you’ve never diddled kids before we can continue. Here we go. Amazing and terribly clever.
minus-squareHalosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoDamn, no evidence provided. Pedophile confirmed.
Because when provided with positive evidence of obvious bias, you demanded proof of a negative which is ranges from prohibitively difficult to impossible. This is not a valid form of reasoning. The inability to disprove something is not a valid reason to believe in it.
Let me put it another way, I don’t converse with paedophiles so I’m going to need proof that you’ve never diddled kids before we can continue.
It was hardly evidence. It was a quip.
Here we go. Amazing and terribly clever.
Damn, no evidence provided.
Pedophile confirmed.