• Compass Inspector@invariant-marxism.red
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              A tankie with a Stalin avatar asks “what’s communism?” You can’t even make this up.

              I’ll let Marx tell you:

              “In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.”

              -Manifesto of the Communist Party

              Within the co-operative society based on common ownership of the means of production, the producers do not exchange their products; just as little does the labor employed on the products appear here as the value of these products, as a material quality possessed by them, since now, in contrast to capitalist society, individual labor no longer exists in an indirect fashion but directly as a component part of total labor.

              -Critique of the Gotha Programme

              • Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                This is obvious, what does your ‘variant’ of Marxism do differently than Marxism-Leninism, and has it come close to establishing a DOTP that can fending off imperialist attacks against it?

                • Compass Inspector@invariant-marxism.red
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Your questions betray a terrible confusion. There was never a DotP “established” by Marxism-Leninism. There was no such thing as “Marxism-Leninism” when the Bolsheviks siezed power from the provisional government in October. By the time “Marxism-Leninism” was created by Stalin, there was no longer a DotP in Russia as the world revolution had degenerated and capitulated to class collaborationist opportunism. “Marxism-Leninism” is the result of and the excuse for that opportunism and from its inception took the role of the ideology of the nationalist foreign policy of the capitalist Soviet State divorced from the historical communist programme.

                  Why do you think Stalin need to jail, kill, or exile all the old guard?

                  • Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    ‘Marxism Leninism’ was created by Lenin a deviation of Marxism suited to the conditions for the newly founded USSR, and it set forth by Stalin. Just because Stalin stimulated economic growth through a mixed economy doesn’t make him a ‘traitor’ or a ‘capitalist’, as it helped develop the industries the USSR needed to fend off the fascist threat during WW2, as the Chinese and Vietnamese are doing today. Also, what was so ‘nationalist’ about the USSR’s foreign policy? It promoted local languages and cultures in all the Soviet republics, and just because Russian was the lingua franca, that doesn’t mean that Stalin was ‘Russifying’ the many republics. Lastly the USSR started collectivization of farms and nationalization of the many industries (Increasing the quality of life dramatically) during his time along with an alliance with independent politicians (Bloc of Communists and Non-Partisans), as for the Red Guard, some of them were opportunists or traitors (Like Trotsky, Yezhov, or Bukharin)