• Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there even a Debian based distro that is up to date like Fedora, does not have snaps and does not have “Unstable” in its name?

          • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not a huge fan of rolling releases but Ubuntu/Debian are too far behind, Fedora is a very nice middle ground.

            • BubblyMango
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              My best middle ground is openSUSE tumbleweed. It is a rolling release but very reliable. Its not bleeding edge. It has snapshots which function like very small stable releases every few days insteqd of every package being updated individually. Every such snapshot has automatic testing. So all in all, very stable for a rolling release.

          • fulano@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just checked their website and it seems like they’re using debian sid packages. What’s the difference between using siduction and plain debian sid, besides having a preconfigured desktop?

            • BubblyMango
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I never used siduction, im juat aware of its existence. I think they add some stability(=reliability) on top of sid and also keep updating packages during sid’s freezes. Dont quote me on this.

          • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Probably the best choice but they have no KDE variant and are working on their own DE so things are probably changing very soon.

          • addie@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mint isn’t super up-to-date, which if you want the cutting edge kernel/mesa for gaming is not great, but it’s a solid choice, and I 🥰 them for keeping all of the Snap shit out of core.

          • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Does Mint still use the Ubuntu packages?

            As @addie@feddit.uk mentioned they are way out of date for gaming on AMD, especially if you purchase a new GPU at some point.

            I switched from Ubuntu to Fedora when I got my 6900 XT because it would have taken another 2-3 months for Ubuntu to catch up to a kernel version where I could use it.

            • Bene7rddso@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              For most packages yes. You can also use Debian Edition, but if you want new packages that’s even worse

            • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Mint is also based on Ubuntu LTS, so it is way behind Fedora by the time another release comes out. I like it as a distro but it doesn’t meet the request.

        • bishopolis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          consider PCLinuxOS for a mageia (mandriva, conectiva and mandrake, both branches from RedHat pre-Enterprise Linux) descendant.