Edit:
It seems that there’s something wrong with the power profiles on the Framework 16. If the power profile is either “Balanced” or “Performance” it runs like shit, but if I put it in “Power Save” mode, the game runs just fine… I think it might have something to do with the USB-C charger for the Framework 16 not providing enough power??
Greetings Helldivers!
I recently acquired a Framework 16 with the AMD RX 7700S, coming from an Asus Strix laptop with an 3070 ti.
AFAIK those two GPU’s should be fairly similar, with the 3070 ti pulling ahead a little. However, the performance on the 7700S is abysmal IMHO in Helldivers 2.
I realise that Helldivers 2 is notorious for being badly optimised, but with the 7700S I’m literally under 20 FPS most of the time. This is with the absolut lowest settings in the game.
With the 3070 ti, I saw a solid 45+ FPS.
I’m rocking CachyOS with:
- kernel version 6.16.5-2-cachyos
- KDE Plasma 6.4.4
- Wayland
- 64GB RAM
- Proton-cachyOS
Steam launch options:
mangohud game-performance %command%
Any ideas? I’m tempted to try it out on Windows as well, to see if the performance is just utter crap with the 7700S or if Helldivers 2 simply doesn’t play well with AMD GPU on Linux.
The 3070 Ti is a lot more powerful compared t o the 7700S, like twice the memory bandwidth and twice the memory bus. Sure, the 8 GB of RAM is the same, but the throughput needed for games like HD2 is pretty high. That explains getting more than twice as many frames with the 3070 Ti.
https://www.hardwaredb.net/geforce-rtx-3070-ti-vs-radeon-rx-7700s
The most telling is the 3DMark score difference:
3DMark Graphics score - 582% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
3070 Ti - 14857 points
7700S - 2178 points
This isn’t saying anything negative about AMD, I have a 9070 XT and absolutely love it. The gap between your two cards is just a lot wider than you were expecting.
It’s the 3070 Ti laptop version I have. https://www.hardwaredb.net/geforce-rtx-3070-ti-laptop-vs-radeon-rx-7700s
That site has terrible numbers
On the 3dmark website top scores Timespy
7700s is 11058 (10970 cpu)
3070ti is 14793 (20660 cpu)
Port royal
7700s - 5873
3070 ti - 8720
Speedway
7700s - 2063
3070 ti - 3724
In normal raster the 7700s is only slightly slower Raytracing is where you will see he biggest performance gap
The gap cant be that much, unless that is desktop (nvidia) vs laptop (amd)
On the 3dmark website top timespy score for
7700s is 11058 (10970 cpu)
3070ti is 14793 (20660 cpu)
Port royal
7700s - 5873
3070 ti - 8720
Speedway
7700s - 2063
3070 ti - 3724
Idk where this site got their numbers from