• BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      If the Threads-blocking instances have this level of maturity, I don’t think we’ll be missing much. Being equally childish as Facebook comments is impressive.

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’d throw some articles showing user counts, but you’d probably just call them fake.

          But if you are actually curious, I can gladly provide some. There was just recently a big influx of users with the EU launch, a tagging system was recently introduced, and more and more large creators have continued to migrate over.

    • toasteecup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Honestly, with the user level blocking feature in personally against instance level blocking as well.

      1. I strong believe in user choice. It’s clear from this thread that there isn’t an overwhelming majority in favor of instance blocking threads. There does not appear to be one that’s not in favor.

      1a) if the instance held a vote on the matter id naturally accept the majority choice.

      1. if privacy is a concern (which it should be because Facebook), we’re already screwed. Fediverse interactions (comments posts votes) are a matter of public record. So even if we block threads at the instance level, they can still zuck up our data so we’re not really gaining anything there.