I’m currently on Win11 but I’m getting that familiar Linux itch and want to dual boot a while again. I tend to gravitate towards Ubuntu simply because it’s so big and well supported by most things.

I’ve run Arch in the past but I’ve gotten too old and lazy for that if I’d be completely honest. I have played with manjaro and endeavour though… and opensuse tumbleweed, rolling is kind of nice.

Not sure what I’d try out first this time so I figured I’d get some inspiration from you guys!

  • Nyanix@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been on Manjaro for 3 years, honestly love it, it’s treated me great for gaming and given me so little to have to fix that my wife has also been running it for 2 years.

  • thayer@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All of my workstations are now running Fedora Silverblue. Steam is installed via flatpak, and GPU is a Radeon 6800 XT. I also have a Steam Link for couch co-op. All is well on the gaming front!

    Debian Sid and Arch have run equally well with this setup. Your choice of distro matters much less now compared to a few years ago, especially if you favour a flatpak workflow.

    Edit: typos!

  • soulsource@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m running Gentoo on my gaming PC, and would not want anything else.

    It’s very customizable, as it allows to tweak packages’ optional dependencies at compile time. It’s also rolling release, so no stress with distribution upgrades. Despite that, it’s also very stable (most of the time…).

    So far the only downside I’ve seen is that updates can take a while, as almost all packages get compiled from source.

    • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gentoo is… well I wouldn’t exactly call it nice, but neat? :)

      I’ve played around with it a bunch but grew impatient with it. The compile times was terrible for me back then.

      Gentoo and Arch do have their niche though. Takes a bit longer to set up but they’re quite customized to your liking when you’re done.

      • soulsource@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The compile times are quite OK on relatively modern hardware. I’ve been using a Ryzen 1700X up to last week, and except for WebKit I had no reason to complain. On my slightly dated Haswell laptop (from 2016) they are now starting to get on my nerves, but it’s still tolerable.

        The only exception is WebKit, which takes forever to compile and which also tends to get installed multiple times, in slightly different versions (one version for Evolution, one for Liferea, one for Epiphany - and yes, those 3 programs all belong to the Gnome desktop). I’ve now set up ccache just for WebKit, but haven’t had to install a WebKit update since, so I have no idea how much the ccache helps…

        Sorry for going on a tangent here. Back on topic: The setup for Gentoo takes as long as you are willing to invest time into it… The more time you invest, the more customized the system gets.

        I’m currently running Sway window manager, with a ton of other not-so-usual tools (some of which I wrote myself, like my status bar application), and I’m really happy with how my PC currently feels. My desktop looks like it just escaped the early 1990s, but it’s so fast and just doesn’t get in the way ever…

        • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can see the charm in that tbh.

          I like the idea of Gentoo, it’s a pretty cool concept. Just a time consuming one as well. :) I remember my problem with it was that I couldn’t really decide how I wanted my system to end up while I was setting it up… which kind of defeats the purpose a bit I felt.

          • soulsource@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, and most of the customization you can do on any other distribution too. The main advantage of Gentoo is that it’s Rolling Release, so there won’t be any distribution upgrades breaking the cusotmizations.

            The same is true for Debian Testing or Arch too, though.

            • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Or openSUSE Tumbleweed :)

              Is Debian Testing actually rolling I thought they froze it before new stable releasea?

              • soulsource@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, it’s not fully “rolling”, as new (non-critical) updates can get delayed for quite some time while packages are getting stabilized for a Stable release.

                • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s strange really. I’ve used Ubuntu on and off since… 8.4 or something like that but I’ve never tried Debian. Don’t even know why.

  • nadiaraven@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Arch with XFCE. Yes, it took a while to get running properly, and just the other day I went to print something and realized cups hadn’t even been installed yet, so I spent 15 minutes getting my printer up and running, so I totally get that it’s not for everyone. I like it because of the detailed wiki with great tutorials and instructions on getting things working, like the one I used to get a nextcloud installation working on my computer. And I like it because of the extensive Arch User Repository, so I know I can install whatever I like. I mostly just play Stardew Valley and trackmania on it. I’ve used Manjaro before and enjoyed that too, and it comes with all the benefits of arch.

    I installed Mint on my friends computer, which works totally fine, but I don’t know how it is for gaming; she definitely doesn’t game.

    • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arch really is a documentation project rather than a distro, their wiki tops most everything out there :)

        • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, that’s basically where you go if you ever have some obscure problem, it’s incredibly useful really.

  • simonced@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my case, I use Fedora exclusively (no dual boot).

    I tried PopOS, but I had problems with each update.

    • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any particular reason for Fedora or is that just what you are comfortable with?

      • simonced@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No real reason I think.

        I had problems with PopOS, but I could have gone Mint since it’s the one I knew the most.

        But since I was reinstalling, I gave Fedora a try, and I liked it so I kept it.

        • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Feels like that’s pretty common these days. Most of the big distros are polished enough to get the work done without jumping through too many hoops really.

    • Icarus@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My last two laptops have been System76 models. The first time I didn’t really love Pop!_OS but the most recent laptop I gave it another shot and it’s come a long way. Really enjoying it overall (still prefer KDE over gnomey stuff tho, lol)

  • sadreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Win11 is worse than a phone vis a vis spying. Finally made a switch. could not install popOS, so ended up with mint.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Im really surprised that I don’t see zorin os on these types of threads. Its main stick is to be chock full of out of the box software especially around windows compatibility. wine and play on linux are ready right away and I can run most windows programs right after install.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes. years now. I keep on trying something else but I don’t have much patience now and take the easy way out.

        • nlm@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s pretty nice that linux has gotten far enough that we can have that luxury these days. :)

  • ostrosco@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using Fedora for the past few years and have been pretty happy with it. It updates at just the right cadence for me where I get new stuff pretty quickly but I’m not on a rolling release.

  • Snart@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fedora but I’m about to move to NixOS Unstable or VanillaOS if it gets better NVIDIA integration.

  • hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mint Cinnamon. Things generally work put of the box. There’s the occasional weird config mess to get into but it’s Linux.

    • Bucket_of_Truth@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The standalone Nvidia driver install panel makes installing the right gpu drivers a breeze.

      The only problem I ran into is that it won’t boot with my main monitor (1440p 165hz) plugged in. I have to use my secondary monitor (4k 60hz) to install the OS and Nvidia drivers first, then shutdown and plug in the main monitor and everything works on the next boot.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I use Cinnamon too. It’s fairly polished and can delve into Ubuntu or Debian when missing something you really want. I find the Nvidia drivers are easy to set up and maintain, and Steam works reasonably well (I have had a few quirks but nothing that I couldn’t resolve).

  • suddenlythequietrose@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been on pop os for at least 2 years now, been loving it. Most of my gaming is through steam so compatibility issues are the exception, not the rule. It’s a bit of a dream come true to play God of War on Linux, it feels like all the stars aligned.

    Even when I bork the install by fucking around in the kernel I wind up getting back on pop rather than finally taking the dive into arch.