• PG_Bleep_Bloop@sh.itjust.worksB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re accepting the nazis at your bar.

    Don’t act surprised when people start calling you the nazi bar and react accordingly.

    Freeze peach isn’t only a right. It carries responsibilities.

    • HTTP_404_NotFound@lemmyonline.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, what else do you want me to do about the issue?

      There is too much content I wish to view at sh.itjust.works. There are lots of valuable communities in place.

      As such, defederation, is not the correct tool in this case.

      • PG_Bleep_Bloop@sh.itjust.worksB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the correct tool from the POV of someone who see that you guys are cool hanging around that kind of pile of shit. They don’t want you to bring them along when you visit their home. It’s as simple as that.

        • HTTP_404_NotFound@lemmyonline.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          OK… (From your earlier comment)

          You’re accepting the nazis at your bar

          Let’s be perfectly clear, this is YOUR BAR. (I am an outsider, visiting from a different bar, in another state).

          That user, and that community, are 100% banned from MY instance.

          • PG_Bleep_Bloop@sh.itjust.worksB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            YOUR BAR

            It’s not. This right here is just an old account that was supposed to be a mod bot. It’ll be deleted later.

            Should have checked if I were speaking to a sh.itizen.

      • PG_Bleep_Bloop@sh.itjust.worksB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why should I? You guys, and you the first, defend keeping exploding-heads federated. It’s enough from an outsider’s point of view.

        • Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why should I? You guys, and you the first, defend keeping exploding-heads federated. It’s enough from an outsider’s point of view.

          Because, and I’m making a large assumption here, you’re attempting to respectfully have a good faith conversation about a topic.

          In this conversation you made an assertion, to wit:

          You’re accepting the nazis at your bar.

          and I requested that you provide proof of your claim. This seems like a reasonable request and philosophy actually has something to say about the matter:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

          When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.

          So, show the proof that backs up your statement. If there are ‘Nazis at [our] bar’ then where are they?

          I mean, if there isn’t any proof of what you’re saying then and you’re just engaging in name calling and bad faith discussion then that would seem to violate the ‘Be Respectful’ rule of the instance.

          • PG_Bleep_Bloop@sh.itjust.worksB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t care about convincing you, and I’ll tell you bluntly that your large assumption is wrong.

            But still, what, you want me to go to exploding-heads and bring you some links showing the kind of homonculi you accept among you? Does it have to come exclusively from here? In the first case, you can find that yourself. I’m not your mom, do some work.

            If there are ‘Nazis at [our] bar

            A grammar type. Just here sir ↑

            • Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Does it have to come exclusively from here?

              Yes, if you’re discussing ‘Nazis at your bar’ then you should point to the Nazis at this bar. Not at any Nazis at any bar on the planet.

              I don’t care about convincing you, and I’ll tell you bluntly that your large assumption is wrong.

              So you’re not here attempting to respectfully have a good faith conversation? That certainly saves me a lot of time in responding to you.

              I would advice against the continuing disrespectful comments. Especially from someone who is so keen on seeing the rules enforced.

              • PG_Bleep_Bloop@sh.itjust.worksB
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                And so, you want me to show the nazis from that place there, that patronize and feel quite comfortable in your bar being nazis specifically inside the bar. Is it correct? Do we have a remindme! bot? I’ll come back to you in three months.

                That certainly saves me a lot of time in responding to you.

                But I thought you enjoyed losing sleep over “arguing with idiots”…

        • maga_force@exploding-heads.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because you are lying and have zero nazi post to link to. Especially from thedonald on sh.itjust.works. Trump is to nazis as water is to cats. Nazi’s can’t stand him.

    • LEFTWINGTEARS@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trump is the least anti-semitic president in history. Possibly anywhere. Thedonald is VERY anti nazi. Any criticism of the donald could in itself be considered an attack on Israel.