• BolexForSoup@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Boomer shooter is a real genre that has defined qualities. If you did even a cursory Google search you would see that.

    Just because something doesn’t make sense to you at face value doesn’t mean it’s arbitrary/makes the term toothless. You’re just uninformed.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No

      Every single time this comes up: We all understand it is a (sub-)genre. Believe us, we know and we love it. We have loved it since the 90s.

      The issue is the name. It attributes a genre to a generation that actively fought against it and tried to get it banned.

      It isn’t a bad genre. It is a bad name.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like the name. For me it has the double meaning of a shooter that goes BOOM. Makes me think of what I feel was a better time for shooters. I always think of the rocket launcher in Doom. And I like that it rhymes with Doom.

        Just showed my son Doom. He loved it. And he was amazed at how fast Doomguy is. Then he discovered the run button.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not about belief. It’s a thing you can literally search and confirm online right now. I don’t know who “us” is either.

        I also didn’t say it was a good or a bad genre. I just said it is one that has a definition.

        As for correcting me with “sub” I sort of just rolled my eyes and moved on, until I noticed you then called it a genre at the end of your comment. Kind of funny is all.