Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

  • Blackmist@feddit.ukEnglish
    293·
    1 year ago

    Maybe you shouldn’t have done it then.

    I can’t make a Jellyfin server full of content without copyrighted material either, but the key difference here is I’m not then trying to sell that to investors.

      • Shazbot@lemmy.worldEnglish
        13·
        1 year ago

        Reading these comments has shown me that most users don’t realize that not all working artists are using 1099s and filing as an individual. Once you have stable income and assets (e.g. equipment) there are tax and legal benefits to incorporating your business. Removing copyright protections for large corporations will impact successful small artists who just wanted a few tax breaks.

      • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
        71·
        1 year ago

        They protect artists AND protect corporations, and you can’t have one without the other. It’s much better the way it is compared to no copyright at all.

          • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
            61·
            1 year ago

            They’re screwed less than they would be if copyright was abolished. It’s not a perfect system by far, but over restrictive is 100x better than an open system of stealing from others.

            • agitatedpotato@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              1 year ago

              So without copyright, if an artist makes a cool picture and coca cola uses it to sell soda and decided not to give the artist any money, now they have no legal recourse, and that’s better? I don’t think the issue is as much copyright inherently, as much as it is who holds and enforces those rights. If all copyrights were necessarily held by the people who actually made what is copy-written, much of the problems would be gone.