Does the end user really prefer apps over a web interfaces? Do native apps bring some security benefits? Isn’t maintaining apps for every single operating system and phone model out there more costly and time consuming than offering universally accessible web interface that works on any device? Isn’t creating apps for every single product out there essentially about data collection?

  • ugh... lo!@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This. All other opinions about “app is easier to maintain” or “expected experience” may be valid, but in reality the vast majority of mobile apps for services are just bloated with tracking.

    Mobile apps have access to more personal information than websites and you are forced to use them. Unfortunately, there is no ublock origin for mobile OSes, thus you either enthusiastic enough to live with guards like TrackerControl or just accept “standard terms”. And let’s face it - 99% of mobile phone owners don’t even know you can block (or, at least, limit) apps access to sensitive info.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      In many / most cases this is correct, but there are exceptions. My banking app isn’t selling my data. I imagine the main thing is support. It’s much easier to explain the process to grandma if there’s a native app.

    • Resistentialism
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s only available for android, however, duckduckgo has an app tracker protection thing.

      Only downside is that it runs aa a vpn, so if you use a vpn out of home, you’ve gotta pick. I suggest you try it and look though. You’ll be horrified

      Oh, also, as a fun experiment. Enable the protection, then go use Chrome for a bit.