• Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    So that’s why all the conservatives are laughing and cheering. I was wondering why they were celebrating. They are accomplishing their mission of killing us all.

    • Cabrio@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 months ago

      Owning the libs will become the most common cause of death of conservatives.

      • K3zi4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Them libs want to protest the climate issue? Well fuck em, let’s burn more oil and make more profit for those companies! That’ll show them snowflake protestors!”

        This is literally the mindset we’re up against. They’ve been brainwashed so hard into “owning libs”, and have their tongues so far up billionaire’s arseholes, they have lost any sense of empathy, sympathy, and basic intelligence. We’re all fucked.

        • Cabrio@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          Part of the problem with being socially minded is that your representatives tend to be less inclined to abuse their power to disingenuously manipulate useful idiots. We’d rather educate them than manipulate them, but they’re too stupid to know the difference.

    • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t worry, they’re gearing up for the “Climate change is real, but we just need to genocide more of the people with a <100kg/yr carbon footprint to fix it” chapter of dogshit rhetoric soon.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’ll never say that in good faith because it’s the rich that have the biggest carbon footprints.

        • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          My point is they’ll (continue to) blame the people whose carbon footprints are <1% of theirs and would be manageable for centuries and advocate for genocide as a solution.

          Currently blaming the global south is just used to deflect.

    • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah, that will be 2027. After the current El Nino oscillation but before the 50 degree summers start.

  • barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Fun fact: All this probably happened because we stopped to geoengineer by outlawing ships blowing sulphur into the air which created additional cloud cover. That is, this year isn’t really exceptional climate-change wise, it’s just that we could witness, by fortuitous natural experiment, how much worse it actually already is… as well as that we can limit the impact by geoengineering. It works, and without wrecking havoc on the overall system.

    And the good news is that we don’t need to blow sulphur into the air to generate clouds, the same effect can be had by blowing salt water into the air, just strap a couple of water cannons to every cargo ship. No I’m dead serious.

    • doomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      All this probably happened because we stopped to geoengineer by outlawing ships blowing sulphur into the air which created additional cloud cover.

      You have your causality running backwards… this was already here, and the sulfur was masking it. This happened because we put so many GHG in the air.

      It works, and without wrecking havoc on the overall system.

      Europe is the one that initiated the sulfur reductions. With the additional dimming data now available, they reviewed it to determine how much damage had been caused. The conclusion? The benefits of reducing sulfur actually outweigh the damage of unmasked warming. The plan for further reductions was upheld.

      If we mask radiative forcing, we don’t want to be doing it with sulfur. That leads to acid rain, ocean acidification, and asthma and other diseases. CaCO3 is a candidate. The long-term consequences of any candidate is unknown. Except that we know that the less sulfur raining down on us and the fish in general, the better.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You have your causality running backwards… this was already here, and the sulfur was masking it.

        Which is what I said?

        • SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It was probably framing it like

          Fun fact: All this probably happened because we stopped to geoengineer by outlawing ships blowing sulphur into the air which created additional cloud cover.

          Instead of something like “we noticed the effects of climate change exceptionally this year because we stopped blowing sulphur (…)”. Yes, this is probably pedantic in a room where everyone understands anthropocentric climate change. Still, I can understand why some people might want to be extremely clear with how we use language regarding this topic, given… Everything that’s going on.

        • doomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Lemmy is acting weird so I can’t go back and quote, but no, you phrased your attribution in reverse at least once.

  • bentropy@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It is totally terrifying but also very strange to read about the record heat everywhere while we here in Germany had probably the coldest July in a decade. We had 16C where we should have had 30C. And we had rain, a lot of rain.

    Still, I’m terrified.

  • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    Phoenix just broke its record for consecutive days over 110° at 31, previous record was half that…

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Cincinnati only had two days over 90 total all summer so far. I think we may get another day this week. Phoenix is getting all of our heat.

  • Alex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    What the Fossil Fuel Industry Doesn’t Want You To Know | Al Gore | TED https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgZC6da4mco

    Oil barrons merely see global warming as yet another catastrophe to take advantage of for power and profit, they will have their companies pump oil til there’s not a single drop left to pump anywhere, using every excuse they can find to keep pumping and polluting while evading taxes and regulation as much as possible. They are evil scum and belong in jail for their lies and behavior.

  • potopato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    43 ºC in my town today. Now we are at 32 ºC and is 23:00.

    This is hell.