• ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So what kind of qualifications do you have to make this assessment, that it’s not a genocide despite looking exactly like one?

    • aliteral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If it moves, sounds and looks like a duck… Saying it is not genocide does not make it disappear.

        • aliteral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No one can deny genocide. Whether they like it or not, Israel is currently commiting genocide against the Palestinian people. And as someone who has jewish ancestry (and was assigned this religion before becoming an atheist), any Jew who supports this makes me wanna vomit. There is no reason to support Israel’s current govt or endeavors. Peace is the only way forward. Restoring the occupied land to their rightful owners is the path forward.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      A law degree and years of practice trying cases, interpreting and applying evidence and standards of proof, proving and disproving intent.

      A high number of civilian casualties does not equal a genocide. Especially not when they are being prevented from leaving by Hamas and being used as human shields.

      Proportionately, the total number of Palestinians compared to total number of Iraqis, there were 150 times more civilian deaths and Iraq per capita than in this war. Do you consider the US war in Iraq to be a genocide?

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Okay, I am going to step over this even though I think the number of civilians killed is outrageous and has beaten lots of high scores of this century.

        But for argument’s sake, what about withholding food, aid, and medical supplies? Doesn’t enabling the population to die of treatable diseases one indicator of a genocide intent?

        About America, probably not due to the lack of intent for genocide, but what the US did was a flagrant undeniable human rights violation. So is your point like this: “other nations have massacred a similar albeit lower number of people per week on average than Israel, so you shouldn’t hold Israel accountable for any crimes despite it indiscriminately killing over 24k civilians in the course of 100 days” ?