• wikibot@lemmy.worldB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

      ` Divide and rule policy (Latin: divide et impera), or divide and conquer, in politics and sociology is gaining and maintaining power divisively. Historically and presently, this strategy was and is used in many different ways by empires seeking to expand their territories; however, it has been hard to distinguish between the exploitation of pre-existing divisions by opponents, and the deliberate creation or strengthening of these divisions implied by “divide and rule”. The strategy, but not the phrase, applies in many ancient cases: the example of Aulus Gabinius exists, parting the Jewish nation into five conventions, reported by Flavius Josephus in Book I, 169–170 of The Jewish War (De bello Judaico). Strabo also reports in Geographica, 8.7.3 that the Achaean League was gradually dissolved when it became part of the Roman province of Macedonia, as the Romans treated the various states differently, wishing to preserve some and to destroy others.Elements of this technique involve:

      creating or encouraging divisions among the subjects to prevent alliances that could challenge the sovereign and distributing forces so that they overpower each other. aiding and promoting those who are willing to cooperate with the sovereign fostering distrust and enmity between local rulers encouraging meaningless expenditures that reduce the capability for political and military spending `

      to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Wow, that’d be a really cool name for bureaucracy if it applied here!

      however, it has been hard to distinguish between the exploitation of pre-existing divisions by opponents, and the deliberate creation or strengthening of these divisions implied by “divide and rule”.

      In this case, it’s “the exploitation of pre-existing divisions”. It’s not like Apple lobbied for “the European nation” to be split.

      I’m pretty sure it was also for compliance with local laws.

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m pretty sure it was also for compliance with local laws.

        I really don’t know if they have separate app stores between north and south Korea :-)

        For all the rich “western” countries, there is only the one legal-cultural difference between (former) British empire and the Latin influenced world. All other law differences are minor.

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Apple can’t even sell to North Korea, so no they have no North Korean App Store.

          As for legal differences, I think maynarkh said it much better than me.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          There absolutely are big differences. Civil vs. common law is about the judicial, and compliance (if it’s lucky) deals mostly with the legislative.

          The EU itself has been created partly to synchronize legal frameworks across member states, so companies like Apple can operate more smoothly and uniformly. Just think about stuff where Wolfenstein games either didn’t release or had separate editions just for Germany. Or just the existing different tax systems in the EU where they are not just different by value but by structure.