• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    Don’t you think that if someone else could come in and undercut this restaurant by just taking home less money they would have already?

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Could? Yeah. Will? Unlikely. If other restaurants are getting away with a certain level of exploitation then there’s not a significant monetary incentive for a newcomer to exploit less.

      That’s part of the issue.

      The only incentive that apparently matters to most people is monetary.

        • unmagical@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Why do so many fast food places only pay minimum wage and throw a hissy fit whenever someone proposes raising it? Why don’t they simply pay their workers more?

          Cause the workers are expendable and their exploitation has been normalized to the point that there is no monetary incentive to pay more. Yes, there are restaurants that do pay more, but it’s often driven from some other ideology, not just trying to make the most money, and most consumers honestly don’t care. The same consumer will sometimes visit McDonald’s, Chik fil a, or In n Out regardless of workers pay, hell I even know a few gay people that turn a blind eye to owner politics when visiting restaurants. 'Cause at the end of the day people are turning up for convenience or to satiate a particular craving, not because one company pays more.