• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    The fact that people who aren’t licensed to drive in the US are driving Waymos is so fucking absurd. The first time one of those remote drivers kills someone is probably going to result in Waymo’s whole business model to collapse from court fees alone.

    • SoupBrick@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      We can dream. They will probably pay a fee and call it a day, treating it as the price of doing business.

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s the thing - they are not driving them, they’re telling the cars where to go to get out of the situation. It’s not great, but it’s tired seeing the hype of “FERR’N PEOPLE DRIVIN’ CARS ON OUR ROADS”.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        actually driving, as in manually taking control of the vehicle by remote.

        Waymo’s chief safety officer, Mauricio Peña, recently noted that when the company’s robotaxis encounter unusual situations, they may request real-time input from a remote response agent

        I don’t know how else to translate “real-time input”.

        • hoch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          From the same article:

          Waymo says its remote fleet response agents do not directly operate vehicle controls, but instead provide real-time contextual information that the autonomous system uses while remaining in control of the vehicle.

          So nobody is taking over and directly piloting the car. It’s probably a good thing to have the car double-check with someone if something strange or unpredictable happens.